[HPADM] about Serviceguard Extension for RAC
From: Ҷѧΰ (vulgate_at_cmict.net)
Date: 02/15/05
- Previous message: Stephanie Chung: "[HPADM] Fwd: Re: [SUMMARY] Emacs Vs PuTTy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:44:39 +0800 To: "hpux-admin" <hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl>
Hello hpux-admin,
somebady dont recommend this.because
"The MC/Serviceguard system needs a lot of scripts to support an application"
this is right?
now , my question is when we need to use "SG for RAC"?
Best regards,
vulgate
vulgate@cmict.net
2005-02-15
--
---> Please post QUESTIONS and SUMMARIES only!! <---
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, contact majordomo@dutchworks.nl
Name: hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl Owner: owner-hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl
Archives: ftp.dutchworks.nl:/pub/digests/hpux-admin (FTP, browse only)
http://www.dutchworks.nl/htbin/hpsysadmin (Web, browse & search)
- Previous message: Stephanie Chung: "[HPADM] Fwd: Re: [SUMMARY] Emacs Vs PuTTy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]