SUMMARY: Ultra 10 and 80 GB HDD

From: Anatoliy Lisovskiy (fox_at_genesyslab.com)
Date: 11/26/03

  • Next message: Marco Greene (Home): "Dual Boot Solaris .. But for Intel"
    Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:02:22 -0800
    To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    
    

    SUMMARY: up to 137 gigs limitation by controller, no problems with 80 GB Seagate on Solaris 8 or 9 has been detected.

    /* A lot of thanks to:

    Mark Day
    Andrew Hay
    Scott Spencer
    Ric Anderson
    Tim Chipman
    Marcelino Mata

    and happy Thanksgiving! */

    ________________________________________
    Hi fellow gurus,
    we need to replace IDE hard drives in some Ultra 10 boxes.
    Did anybody try to use widely available now 80 GB drives?

    _______________________________________
    We've ordered several batches now, and have just used whatever 80 GB OEM
    Seagate drives we were shipped. I want to say that there was
    a transition from Barracuda III to Barracuda IV during that period,
    but that is from memory. I would expect that pretty much *any*
    80 GB ATA drive would work. We went with Seagate just because their
    drives are a little bit quieter, and we've had good luck with them
    in the past.
    ______________________________________

    it's been done. the trick is - depending on how old your solaris is -
    to -not- rely on format to discover disk geometry, but rather enter it
    by hand. and s2.6 [for instance] has ultimate limits of 64h * 255s *
    16383c, so you may have to play with the maker's recommended geometry
    to make it fit.

    _______________________________________

    No, but I am using Western Digital 120GB
    caviar drives in Ultra-10s (300Mhz) with
    no problem, running Solaris 8 2/02. Bigger
    drives will not work due to hardware in the
    on board IDE controller

    Earlier versions of SunOS have problems with
    large IDE drives as outlined in
    http://www.science.uva.nl/pub/solaris/solaris2.html
    Question 5.64.

    _________________________________________

    Anatoliy,

    We've installed pairs of 40GB HD's but not an 80. Best idea is to give
    it a try. You can always return the HD if it doesn't work. The only
    issue is would the entire 80GB be usable or just partial.

    Let me know if you can use any more Ultra 10's or any other Sun H/W in
    the future.

    ___________________________________________

    so long as you are on solaris8 or later, it shouldn't be a problem. The
    "problem" typically arises when you get to the HW limitation of the IDE
    controller used in these boxes, which is approx 130gigs.

    I've added (personally) 20gig 3rd party drives to U5 systems ; 20,40,60
    gig drives to blade100 systems. Never had a problem. Lots of online docs
    concurr with this general theory of life.

    Hope this helps a bit,

    Tim

    ___________________________________________

    You are limited to 137Gb on Ultra 10 and Solaris 8. Solaris 6/7 has lower
    limits. 137Gb is limit of IDE controller.

    -- 
    Anatoliy Lisovskiy,
    Senior Unix Administrator, Engineering Support
    Genesys, an Alcatel company
    (415) 355-5039 (work)
    (415) 572-4127 (cell)
    _______________________________________________
    sunmanagers mailing list
    sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
    

  • Next message: Marco Greene (Home): "Dual Boot Solaris .. But for Intel"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Strange PEER error with Danis 506 1.81 generic question
      ... In the case of everything so far up until the Intel 915GAVL/GEVL and still in research 945 series motherboards, there have been two IDE controllers on the boards. ... Thus the primary hard disk controller from which the finished box will normally boot would be the Master on IDE controller #1. ... if there were, for example, two IDE hard drives, one would be the normal boot device as the Master on the primary IDE controller. ... to generate a report of scsi and "fake scsi" devices on a mixed scsi hard drives/ide dvd burner and dvd-rom system but I seem to recall that all scsi devices got listed before any ide devices - including the scsi scanner I had. ...
      (comp.os.os2.bugs)
    • Re: Changing Harddrives whilst PC includes a RAID Array
      ... Booting from Acronis CD after re-attaching IDE drive to system didn't work ... I detached both SATA drives and booted from Acronis Cd again ... ... case to ensure that RAID is not being 'attempted'on my IDE drive. ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
    • RE: Why would drive run at UDMA33? (Segate 80GB)
      ... I have an PC with mfg date of 5/2003 and the motherboard manually ... IDE controller because it will force the IDE controller to step down ... drives but also mixing UDMA100 and UDMA66 and UDMA33 disk on any IDE ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Changing Harddrives whilst PC includes a RAID Array
      ... I assume if your IDE drive is NOT ... attached, the SATA array will still boot, correct? ... Option #2 (should be done w/ SATA and IDE drives installed): ... install on the IDE drive. ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
    • Re: Server Migration Issue
      ... there the BIOS would automagically offer it as a choice in the boot menu. ... I belive it would _possibly_ be safer to use an IDE RAID controller (not ... It actually has an IDE controller which is connected to the ... >> to the SATA drives either by processes similar to Norton Ghost or by ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)