Solaris 9 and Blade 150 with ATA drive

From: Ricky Chan (RChan_at_seattle.telecomsys.com)
Date: 05/26/04

  • Next message: NetComrade: "Best way to share (r/w) 3310 disk array between two nodes"
    To: "'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org'" <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
    Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:09:38 -0700
    
    

    Hi Managers,
    I'm getting this on my new SunBlade 150 with Solaris 9 after some period of
    time under no load:

    May 22 11:31:35 mzwarts dada: WARNING: /pci@1f,0/ide@d/dad@0,0 (dad0):
    May 22 11:31:35 mzwarts transport rejected (-2)
    May 22 11:31:35 mzwarts dada: WARNING: /pci@1f,0/ide@d/dad@0,0 (dad0):
    May 22 11:31:35 mzwarts transport rejected (-2)
    May 22 11:31:35 mzwarts dada: WARNING: /pci@1f,0/ide@d/dad@0,0 (dad0):
    May 22 11:31:35 mzwarts transport rejected (-2)

    The box hangs and the above message is displayed on the console continously.
    I can power cycle
    the box and it's fine for a certain amount of time until this happens again.
    The blade is running
    Solaris 9 04/04 with the latest patch cluster. I have the latest OBP on the
    blade.
    OBP 4.10.6 2003/06/06 12:30
    POST 2.0.1 2001/08/23 17:13
    I tried loading Solaris 8 on the blade. It worked fine with Solaris 8. I
    bet there is some
    issue for the ATA drive with Solaris 9. If anyone got this problem before,
    I appreciate
    if you can email me and let me know how you resolved the problem. Thanks in
    advance!

    Regards,
    Ricky Chan
    Development UNIX System Administrator
    Telecommunication System
    email: rchan@seattle.telecomsys.com
    _______________________________________________
    sunmanagers mailing list
    sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers


  • Next message: NetComrade: "Best way to share (r/w) 3310 disk array between two nodes"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Peformance of Solaris 10 vs 9 on Ultra 80.
      ... But I can't recall the hardware the guy had. ... The Blade 100 is UltraSparc IIe, not UltraSparc II, and that *might* ... "What I see so far is that Solaris 10 represents the beginning of the ... blame Sun for optimising Solaris 10 for new machines, but if they do, it ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Peformance of Solaris 10 vs 9 on Ultra 80.
      ... But I can't recall the hardware the guy had. ... The Blade 100 is UltraSparc IIe, not UltraSparc II, and that *might* ... "What I see so far is that Solaris 10 represents the beginning of the ... blame Sun for optimising Solaris 10 for new machines, but if they do, it ...
      (comp.sys.sun.admin)
    • Re: Sun killing Solaris, your SPARC comments seem to be fud
      ... I have to use Solaris Express. ... I just setup smpatch on the Blade to utilize my Squid proxy server ... and started "smpatch analyze". ... since I also saw Gnome and Mozilla patches passing my screen. ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Solaris 10 dvd istallation Sun Blade 1000
      ... blade systems and Solaris OS. ... I resently got a sun blade 1000 system. ... I am trying to install solaris 10 from the 1/06 dvd media kit. ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Possible to burn CD that is readable on both Windows & Solaris?
      ... >> did have burn failures and so started to use a speed of 4. ... > I also just copied the tars over to my Blade 100, and did it there also, ... > Solaris SPARC box, but I do have Solaris X86 on another machine. ... I put the same CDROM into an old PC that I have that has Solaris 10 X86 ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)