SUMMARY: Fp0 error

From: Adrian Phipps (AC) (PhippsAC_at_telkom.co.za)
Date: 09/27/04

  • Next message: Syed Saifudeen: "SE3510 Redundant Controller Channels not detected"
    Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:42:01 +0200
    To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
    
    

    Hi all,

    Thanks to all who were willing to assist with this small error. After
    installing all the required patches for the SAN package the error did
    not occur again and I can now see the tape drives. I initially had a
    problem with installing the patches but a workaround was found, see
    below

    Patch List
    111095-17
    111096-10
    111412-15
    111413-14
    111846-08
    111847-08
    113766-02
    113767-06
    114475-04
    114877-08

    >
    > When installing a patch, the Solaris 2.5+ patch installation
    > procedure will execute the script "checkinstall" with uid nobody.
    >
    > If any of the patch files or if any part of the path leading up
    to
    > the patch directory cannot be read by nobody, an error similar to
    > the following will appear:
    >
    > patchadd . # or ./installpatch .
    > Generating list of files to be patched...
    > Verifying sufficient filesystem capacity (exhaustive method) ...
    > Installing patch packages...
    > pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
    > ....
    >
    > You can workaround this in two ways, one is to make sure that the
    > user "nobody" can read all patch files and execute a "pwd" in the
    > patch directory or add an account "install" to /etc/passwd:
    >
    > install:x:0:1:installpatch braindamage:/:/bin/true
    >
    > Installpatch and patchadd use "nobody" as a fallback if it cannot
    > find the "install" user.

    Adrian Phipps
    90 Durban Road
    IT Building
    Bellville
    Work 021-949 4642
    Cell 082 787 7321
    Fax 021-945 4740

     <<Picture (Metafile)>>

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Adrian Phipps (AC)
    > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:27 AM
    > To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    > Subject: Fp0 error
    >
    > Hi there,
    >
    > I have just recently installed a 6767A HBA on a SF15K and now get
    > this weird message. I can't find anything similar on the web, can
    > anybody point me in the right direction?
    >
    > Sep 23 09:18:50 fcp: [ID 305930 kern.warning] WARNING: fp0: no
    > driver for device @w100000e00221e227,79:
    >
    > Regards
    >
    >
    >
    > Adrian Phipps
    > 90 Durban Road
    > IT Building
    > Bellville
    > Work 021-949 4642
    > Cell 082 787 7321
    > Fax 021-945 4740
    >
    > << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
    >
    >

    ==================================================================
    This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
    e-mail legal notice available at
    http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF

    [demime 1.01b removed an attachment of type image/bmp which had a name of ole0.bmp]
    _______________________________________________
    sunmanagers mailing list
    sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers


  • Next message: Syed Saifudeen: "SE3510 Redundant Controller Channels not detected"

    Relevant Pages

    • Repost: Solaris Live Upgrade: questions about /var/sadm
      ... Newer patches will save the old files ... If the previous patch installation saved the old ... you should go back to the previous version before installing? ... Apply patch blabla-02 (BlaBla-01 saved) ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Patch Check Advanced
      ... I developed my own script - Patch Check Advanced (PCA). ... downloading and installing of patches from Sunsolve. ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • RE: new IIS worm? (rcp lsass.exe)
      ... Some good examples of this are some SQL patches. ... not actually installing the files? ... require a work around and not a patch. ... by the patch are at the proper versions. ...
      (Incidents)
    • Re: reinstall patch
      ... You have WinXP SP1 installed, the fixes in which supersede KB328310. ... Your reply also tells me that you're not up-to-date with IE/OE patches, ... alone installing WinXP SP2). ... > hi i get these patch: ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • 9_Recommended error codes (specifically return code 5)
      ... * "return code 2" indicates patches are already installed. ... * "return code 25" means a patches requires another patch that is not yet installed. ... With or without using the save option, the patch installation process ... Installing 114008-01... ...
      (SunManagers)