SAN 3310 Multiple LUN's Not Visible on Solaris 9 Host

From: Ian Wallace (iwallace_at_eforceglobal.com)
Date: 03/11/05

  • Next message: Pere Blay: "solaris 10 and printer ppd files"
    To: Sun Managers <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
    Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:08:02 -0700
    
    

    First, thanks to anyone who has a suggestion. I've been searching on
    the web for the past 5 hours, reading posts, fiddling with this,
    reseting the controllers, all to no avail. Here's the issue.

    We have:
    Solaris 9 (latest patches) connected to a 3310 array via SCSI. It's
    connected on the primary controller, and currently has a single Logical
    Drive that is mounted on the host. No problem.

    We just got two new disks in and wanted to expand the space on this host
    to make use of our two new drives. Great. Popped in the disks, reset
    the controller, recognizes the disks. I expanded the Logical Drives
    with the two new disks. No problem. The 3310 now shows that the LD is
    270GB rather than 135GB. I then created a second partition with the new
    space (approximately 135GB) and mapped that to a host LUN on the primary
    controller. Just to be safe, I reset the controllers on the array
    again. I still see that I have 270GB of space, two partitions, mapped
    to two LUNS.

    Logical Drive: 0
    Partition: 0
    Lun: 0

    Logical Drive: 0
    Partition: 1
    Lun: 1

    I can see the first partition/LUN with format. It shows up on c1t0d0
    however I would expect to see another one for c1t0d1 (to match the
    second partition).

    I have added extra LUN lines for the sd driver to /kernel/drv/sd.conf
    and reconfigured the driver with:

    update_drv -f sd.conf ; devfsadm

    But that doesn't show me the second partition. Am I just missing
    something completely obvious? I've seen some posts about not being able
    to see beyond the 'first' lun, but that's usually when you didn't have a
    partition on lun 0, which I do.

    Thanks to anyone who might have an idea.
    cheers
    ian
    _______________________________________________
    sunmanagers mailing list
    sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers


  • Next message: Pere Blay: "solaris 10 and printer ppd files"

    Relevant Pages

    • SUMMARY: Re: SAN 3310 Multiple LUNs Not Visible on Solaris 9 Host
      ... My disks show up as: ... > connected on the primary controller, and currently has a single Logical ... > Partition: 0 ... > Lun: 0 ...
      (SunManagers)
    • Re: em0 watchdog timeout (and 3ware problems) 7-stable
      ... After restarting, the system partition is no ... SATA controller, connected to 16 1TB SATA drives, this configured as ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: Good reasons4 NOT choosing freebsd
      ... This should be handled by the controller ... can reside inside "huge files" within an NTFS/FAT32 partition. ... Windows or anything else. ... a distribution that requires Windows in order to ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Serverdimensionierung
      ... mit vernünftigem Controller einen Controller mit meheren Kanälen, ... Für's System sind jetzt zwei gespiegelte 36er Raid 1 Platten vorgesehen. ... sowie Exchange DB und Log Files des Exchange halten soll - ich halte das für ... Auf Partition 1 das System und Swap File, auf Partition 2 die Exchange DB. ...
      (microsoft.public.de.german.backoffice.smallbiz)
    • Re: Quorum disk creation on serveraid-6m
      ... A Logical Unit Number (LUN) is very different from a Partition. ... disks by making Logicals, ... MVP - Windows Server - Clustering ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)