SUMMARY: Sun StorEdge 3310 performance monitoring

przemolicc_at_poczta.fm-no-spam-now
Date: 03/29/05

  • Next message: Rajeev Sharma: "apache 2.0.5 on Solaris 9"
    Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:53:31 +0200
    To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    
    

    The only one answer from Nathan:

    ------------------------------------
    SUNWstade.

    The tools are complicated and poorly documented and meant for large SAN
    FC systems, and don't work very well, at least the current release I'm
    using. There are a few whitepapers and stuff scattered around, best
    practices, blueprint, whatever Sun calls that stuff.

    <http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=40fda685>
    <http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=41c884fa>

    Complicated by the fact that the newest patch for stade 2.4 requires a
    major firmware update to the 3310 (411E vs. current 325W) and the
    SUNWsscs v2.0 which I think is the same thing as the "Sun StorEdge [tm]
    3000 Family Storage Products--Related Software" which is currently 1.5.

    The new fw and sscs haven't been released yet from what I can tell, and
    will be a =major= update requiring downtime.

    Good luck, I've been wrestling with it part time for a while.

    Best,

    --Nathan
    Return-Path: <sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org>
    X-Original-To: przemol@localhost
    Delivered-To: przemol@localhost
    Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
      host.pgf.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEBCDF947 for
      <przemol@localhost>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:30:24 +0100 (CET)
    Received: from poczta.fm [217.74.64.235] by localhost with POP3
      (fetchmail-6.2.5) for przemol@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 24 Mar
      2005 09:30:24 +0100 (CET)
    Received: by mx.poczta.interia.pl (Postfix, from userid 502) id
      2600F254261; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:09:48 +0100 (CET)
    Received: from sunportal.sunmanagers.org (sunportal.sunmanagers.org
      [128.100.17.250]) by mx.poczta.interia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id
      657F12541E9 for <przemolicc@poczta.fm>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:09:18
      +0100 (CET)
    Received: from sunportal.sunmanagers.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
      sunportal.sunmanagers.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657721E70E; Thu, 24
      Mar 2005 03:07:11 -0500 (EST)
    X-Original-To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    Delivered-To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    Received: from free.pgf.com.pl (free.medicines.com.pl [212.51.202.99])
      by sunportal.sunmanagers.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED921E588 for
      <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:06:18 -0500 (EST)
    Received: from host.pgf.com.pl (unknown [212.51.202.71]) by
      free.pgf.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275473791E for
      <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:00:40 +0100 (CET)
    Received: by host.pgf.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D482EDF947;
      Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:06:15 +0100 (CET)
    Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:06:15 +0100
    From: przemolicc@poczta.fm-no-spam-now
    To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    Message-ID: <20050324080615.GB2699@host>
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
    Subject: Sun StorEdge 3310 performance monitoring
    X-BeenThere: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
    Precedence: list
    Reply-To: przemolicc@poczta.fm
    List-Id: The Sun Managers Mailing List <sunmanagers.sunmanagers.org>
    List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers>,
      <mailto:sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org?subject=unsubscribe>
    List-Archive: <http://sunportal.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/sunmanagers>
    List-Post: <mailto:sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
    List-Help: <mailto:sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org?subject=help>
    List-Subscribe: <http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers>,
      <mailto:sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org?subject=subscribe>
    Sender: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
    Errors-To: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
    X-Spam: No, spamicity=0.000000

    Does anybody know any software which let me monitor 3310 disk array ?
    I am interested especially in cache and disks monitoring. I know that using
    telnet I can monitor cache but I need some sort of history of disk and cache load.

    Regards
    przemol
    _______________________________________________
    sunmanagers mailing list
    sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
    _______________________________________________
    sunmanagers mailing list
    sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
    http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers


  • Next message: Rajeev Sharma: "apache 2.0.5 on Solaris 9"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Why is disk performance occasionally so slow?
      ... I suggest that you should run while monitoring various things. ... Are you using the disk controller to make the copy or backup, ... Also, if you are making a container file, I can't tell if the slowdown ... Ive used Everest to view the SMART data and it hasnt reported any problems. ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
    • Re: Problems getting pics from Minolta
      ... You can open a terminal window and start monitoring your syslog with: ... Disk /dev/sda: 7 MB, 7954432 bytes ... Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Monitoring von Webtraffic
      ... Der Cache hat 20 GB, ... dass Downloads durch Clients (Ziel sind meist akamai ... Ich kann über das Monitoring herausbekommen, ... beobachten und konnte den Client ermitteln. ...
      (microsoft.public.de.german.isaserver)
    • [Full-disclosure] Re: Intel Hyperthreading Cache Vulnerability (was: Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentatio
      ... > some vague hints about what's in the other guy's cache by watching the ... I first log into this server, and start up a cache monitoring program ... The ssh daemon has a significant amount of ... so it is likely to get on the CPU pretty quick. ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: WIN XP SYSTEM RESTORE FAILS 80%
      ... If any monitored drive/partition falls below 50 MB's of free disk space, all restore points will be deleted. ... stop monitoring all drives/partition other than the one Windows is installed on. ... I just learned how to get and read LOG REVIEWER and it says, for the last two failed events: "SR was disabled because of lack of space on sys disk. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)