SUMMARY Does Anyone Have Experience of Using The Fair Share Sche duler With Oracle
- From: "SPALL, James" <SPALLJ@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:52:02 +0100
Thanks for all the responses, especially Deborah Crocker who shared
her experience of Solaris 10
We have a large Sun server running Solaris 9 which hosts about six oracleWe're using it under Solaris 10, although we've never maxed out the CPUs.
databases. At peak times all the cpu's on the box are max'ed out and we'd
like to ring-fence one of the oracle databases so that it is always able
to get about 85% of the available cpu power. Does anyone have any
practical experience of if the fair share scheduler works well with
oracle.
The server in question is running Solaris 9 9/05, the oracle db is 920
and we've already got the SUNWfss package installed.
Any other suggestions for dealing with this welcome - Solaris 10 and zones
is not an option at the moment though.
thanks
James
We've got a similar scenario. We have a database that needs to get time, if
the box is ever maxed out.
One point that needs to be remembered is that the listener for your favored
database needs to be started in the same project that you run the database
in.
I have a "user.oracle" project that handles most stuff. Then there special
projects for the databases that need them. Our favored database has its own
listener on a separate port.
Deb C.
Feel better with BUPA
Visit http://www.bupa.com or call 0800 00 10 10 and find out what BUPA can do for you.
BUPA House 15-19 Bloomsbury Way London WC1A 2BA
Internet communications are not secure and therefore BUPA does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of BUPA.
BUPA Insurance Limited, BUPA Health Assurance Limited, BUPA Insurance Services Limited and Goldsborough Estates Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
- Prev by Date: SUMMARY: Solaris 9: Max cpu usage for a user!
- Next by Date: Attaching 36G Scsi drives to SunFire V240
- Previous by thread: Change HBAs in V490
- Next by thread: Attaching 36G Scsi drives to SunFire V240
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: Solaris/UFS logging performance issue.
... > Some systems here have been upgraded from Solaris 2.6 to ... > As part
of the O/S upgrade, ... > run large database jobs has now reduced by 30-50%.
... both the mountoptions logging + forcedirectio ... (comp.unix.solaris) - Re: Impact of two databases sharing an oracle instance
... which is Orcale 8.1.7.2) on a single Solaris box. ... now we want to move to
a new Solaris box which has a single database ... >> schema) on the same Solaris
machine ... >> 4) Temporary tablespace ... (comp.databases.oracle.server) - Re: Impact of two databases sharing an oracle instance
... which is Orcale 8.1.7.2) on a single Solaris box. ... >now we want to move
to a new Solaris box which has a single database ... >>> schema) on the
same Solaris machine ... >>> 4) Temporary tablespace ... (comp.databases.oracle.server) - Re: Unable to load JdbcOdbc library
... The database only exposes ODBC for external ... > On the Solaris
side, ... IBM offers a 100% Java driver for Informix ... (comp.lang.java.databases) - Unable to load JdbcOdbc library
... I am trying to connect to an Informix database on a stand-alone ... On a PC
I set up a system DSN for the database under ODBC, ... On the Solaris side, ...
JDBC to ODBC Bridge: Checking security ... (comp.lang.java.databases)