SUMMARY : raidz zpool question
- From: Iain Miller <iainonthemove@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:00:53 +0100
Hi List,
Thanks to
Anthony D'Atri, DRoss-Smith, Chris Hoogendyk, Chris Banal, Hendrik
Visage, Karl Fosburg, Francisco Roque, Eric D. Mudama
Who all basically said not to put all the disks into a single raidz
vdev for varying reasons. These included
- Increased impact from disk failures. RAIDZ can tolerate two
failures, anymore and the whole data needs restored (from tape)
- Increased time to rebuild array from a single drive failure as the
rebuild will need to access all the drives in the array.
- The number of drives in a RAIDZ set should not exceed 9 drives (any
more than 6 is viewed as "risky")
Other general feedback included
-RAIDZ is really only suited for large IO and if performance is more
important look at mirrors (with the tradeoff of less usable space).
-More RAIDZ pools gives better performance from an IOPS point of view
than one large RAIDZ vdev.
-There's a ZFS best practices guide at
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide
Thanks to you all for the constructive feedback - I am going to go
with the first layout.
Cheers,
Iain.
--
Iain Miller
iainonthemove@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SUMMARY : raidz zpool question
- From: Iain Miller
- Re: SUMMARY : raidz zpool question
- Prev by Date: Unable to Initialize 2TB lun under vxvm 5.0 mp3
- Next by Date: solaris 10 arp monitoring
- Previous by thread: Unable to Initialize 2TB lun under vxvm 5.0 mp3
- Next by thread: Re: SUMMARY : raidz zpool question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|