Update and kind of summary "Strange NFS behaviour "
From: Yogesh Bhanu (yogesh_at_gsf.de)
Date: 06/30/03
- Previous message: Markus Waldorf: "LPR output filter died 5.1A pk4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:38:41 +0200 To: 'Tru64 User Group' <tru64-unix-managers@ornl.gov>
Hello Managers,
My question
My Wildfire system which also hosts a NFS server gives the best NFS
performance when the same Blast Tables are accessed localy and across
NFS ...
As always I was flooded with responses . I got respnses
responses and responses .
Almost everybody had one thing to say .
The tables are cached in Memory and so access times for the data is
reduced in comparison to the tables accessed from disk hence the
increase in performance .
Jim Belonis even suggested creating a RAMDISK , to keep t
he tables . As these tables are 16Gigs and getting bigger ;), I will
have to settle to some alternate way of speeding up .
Thanks all for responding .
But this still makes me think as I dont see this performance gain when
two systems are parsing the same data over NFS simultaneously .
yogesh
- Previous message: Markus Waldorf: "LPR output filter died 5.1A pk4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
