Tru64 4.0F PK8 - dependencies
From: Wakeman, Lindsay (Lindsay.Wakeman_at_bl.uk)
Date: 09/19/03
- Previous message: Sandels, Mark: "cpio -i losing data if b parameter not used"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:16:51 +0100 To: "'tru64-unix-managers@ornl.gov'" <tru64-unix-managers@ornl.gov>
Hi Folks,
I wondered whether anyone has run into problems installing the latest
patchkit for 4.0F (patchkit 8)? I couldn't find anything on the list
archive.
This relates to individually installed security patches conflicting with
patches rolled into the cumulative kit.
I get two different effects on similar machines:-
On System 1, in baselining it lists patch 1493 (a jumbo I think) as having
patch applicability conflicts with each of my previously installed SSRT
patches - loads of them.
On System 2, it passes baselining, but then complains about problems
installing 32 patches because of conflicts with (so-called) Customer
Specific Patches. leaving these out, it then complains about needing the
jumbo patch 1493 for a further 78 patches.
I know some people have seen this problem in the past (Hi Bob! :) but
wondered whether anyone else has got the problem with this patchkit. Please
tell me I don't have to un-install dozens of patches that were *not*
Customer Specific.
Thanks for any help,
Lindsay
**************************************************************************
Now exhibiting at the British Library Galleries:
Painted Labyrinth : the world of the Lindisfarne Gospels
Until 28 September 2003. Admission Free.
*************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the
postmaster@bl.uk : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or
copied without the sender's consent.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The
British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the
author.
*************************************************************************
- Previous message: Sandels, Mark: "cpio -i losing data if b parameter not used"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
