disklabeling vs advfs volumes

kdea_at_alpine-la.com
Date: 07/28/05

  • Next message: Christian Wessely: "True64 on DEC Alpha 8200 ..."
    Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:53:40 -0700
    To: tru64-unix-managers@ornl.gov
    
    

    Hi Managers,

    This might turn out to be a stupid question, but it's a subject I don't
    understand well myself.

    We have a MSA1000 with an aggregate raw disk size of about 1.8 TB. We want
    to split this up into at least 3 volumes/partitions/moun-points whatever
    the correct word is. We want to keep it as a RAID-5, with spare disks for
    redundancy, use AdvFS, and maximize our disk space.

    The way I see it, there's many ways to split up a disk. I could use the
    MSA1000 to split the disks into three disk sets. But obviously the more
    disk "sets" I make using the MSA1000, the less storage space I will have,
    because I need to dedicate one whole disk as a spare disk.

    I could make one single disk set, make them into one whole Advfs domain,
    and split them into many volumes. I don't have a AdvFS Advanced Utilities
    license, but I think I can obtain one. This has the advantages of only
    needing one spare disk.

    Finally, I was suggested by my boss make one disk set, then split them up
    using diskconfig into several disklabel logical partitions, say
    /dev/disk/dsk5a, /dev/disk/dsk5b, /dev/disk/dsk5d. Then making a single
    Advfs domain, and fileset in each partition. This sounds bizzare, but I
    can't think of anything wrong with it.

    My question is, is there something fundamentally flawed with the third
    option? I never really understood the concept of disklabeling partitions,
    I know you use dsk*a for the root partition, dsk*b is for the swap, dsk*c
    is for the entire disk - but what if I used it as a way to split it up into
    3 data partitions?

    --
    Kevin Dea
    UNIX System Administrator
    Alpine Electronics Research of America
    

  • Next message: Christian Wessely: "True64 on DEC Alpha 8200 ..."

    Relevant Pages

    • LVM on SW RAID for sarge - success
      ... I've just had success migrating Debian Sarge to root on LVM on RAID. ... First make sure the SCSI BIOS boots from the first disk. ... I made reiserfs on all the filesystem partitions and completed the ... The remaining two disks were partitioned and used to create RAID arrays ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: RAMDisk and HardDisk strikes back!
      ... One disk with only one partition as large as FBA setup; ... Two disk with one or more partitions for each. ... @ 20:32:55.252 #W059 Selecting best compatible driver failed. ... @ 20:53:51.166 #T211 Install Device: Changing registry settings as specified ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded)
    • Root partitions not detected at boot time
      ... In my previous bug repor, I was using raid1; now, I am using raid5, as ... device sdc2 operational as raid disk 2 ... The last line shows my raid partitions are detected. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Software RAID partitions not detected at boot time with linux 2.6.25.1.
      ... In my previous bug repor, I was using raid1; now, I am using raid5, as ... device sdc2 operational as raid disk 2 ... The last line shows my raid partitions are detected. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Maxtor Backup failure - ping Anna! (about Acronis)
      ... a new HD if you use True Image. ... program for cloning the contents of one HD to another HD similar to the ... the newer disk will be larger. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)