Tape Changer and SCU
- From: J Bacher <jb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:59:41 -0500
OS: Tru64 5.1
Tape: TZ89
Customer replaced the external scsi tape/changer with the same model and scsi ID and rebooted.
Upon reboot:
CAM Equipment Device Table (EDT) Information:
Bus/Target/Lun Device Type ANSI Vendor ID Product ID Revision N/W
-------------- ----------- ------ --------- ---------------- -------- ---
1 0 0 Direct SCSI-2 COMPAQ LOGICAL VOLUME 3.54 N
1 1 0 Direct SCSI-2 COMPAQ LOGICAL VOLUME 3.54 N
1 32 0 RAID SCSI-2 COMPAQ Smart Array 5300 3.54 N
3 0 0 CD-ROM SCSI-2 COMPAQ CDR-8435 0013 N
SCSI DEVICE DEVICE DRIVER NUM DEVICE FIRST
HWID: DEVICEID HOSTNAME TYPE SUBTYPE OWNER PATH FILE VALID PATH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
61: 0 ns disk none 2 1 dsk0 [1/0/0]
62: 1 ns disk none 2 1 dsk1 [1/1/0]
63: 3 ns cdrom none 0 1 cdrom0 [3/0/0]
66: 2 ns raid none 0 1 scp0 [1/32/0]
67: 4 ns changer none 0 1 (null)
68: 5 ns tape none 0 1 (null)
SCSI DEVICE DEVICE DRIVER NUM DEVICE FIRST
HWID: DEVICEID HOSTNAME TYPE SUBTYPE OWNER PATH FILE VALID PATH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
67: 4 ns changer none 0 1 (null)
WWID:0c000008:0090-0d24-1355-0418
BUS TARGET LUN PATH STATE
---------------------------------
2 0 0 stale
SCSI DEVICE DEVICE DRIVER NUM DEVICE FIRST
HWID: DEVICEID HOSTNAME TYPE SUBTYPE OWNER PATH FILE VALID PATH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
68: 5 ns tape none 0 1 (null)
WWID:04100022:"DEC TZ89 (C) DECCX908S8803"
BUS TARGET LUN PATH STATE
---------------------------------
2 4 0 stale
A "scu scan edt" (and "scu scan edt bus 2) does not find the tape drive so that I can create the device drivers, etc.
Will dn_setup to install the tape build the edt and update the hwmgr table?
Also, are there freeware tools available to utilize the changer? (I've only used commercial products in the past).
Thanks in advance.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
- Follow-Ups:
- 5.1b vs. 5.1b3
- From: Douglas B. Jones
- 5.1b vs. 5.1b3
- Prev by Date: Sendmail in U state
- Next by Date: 5.1b vs. 5.1b3
- Previous by thread: Sendmail in U state
- Next by thread: 5.1b vs. 5.1b3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|