Hello Managers,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible/advisable to load the DST patch for
5.1b without also loading the jumbo patches to bring 5.1b up to 5.1b-3?
ITRC seems to imply that the jumbo patch is a prerequisite.
I have a client who is running a proprietary application and database and
they are hesitant to load the jumbo patch because of its potential impact
on their application.
Re: Problems with the On Lisp development model ... ... > separately, and installed into some known directory, with gcl, maxima,... > Or should there be a one time process which runs on patch installation... You could treat maxima as a single application, and load it independently ... This means that there is a start up cost to load the patches each time. ... (comp.lang.lisp)
Re: [rfc][patch] sched: remove smpnice ... appended patch) too but was n't much bothered as active load balance ... And the reason is the code still assumes that a unit load is ... I've mistakenly assumed that busiest...int local_group; ... (Linux-Kernel)
Re: [PATCH (update 3)] timer: Run calc_load halfway through each round_jiffies second ... (I've removed the other CC:s for now to avoid annoying them - assuming removing them from the CC: list doesn't do that). ... I still don't know why you think it may change the computation of load, and it's not really complex at all. ... After an initial sync the patch does not change how often the calc_load computation is run or how it works, it will still be run exactly the same way and every 5*HZ ticks as before. ... (Linux-Kernel)
Re: problems with KB951746 ... Also, if this were a firewall issue, I think it would be there all the time, ... not just when the system is under load.... I doubt the patch, or SBS, is the problem here. ... different forwarders, different DNS servers, and root hints only. ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
