Re: SMTP authentification
From: Phillip Helbig (HELBPHI@sysdev.deutsche-boerse.com)
Date: 04/04/03
- Next message: Phillip Helbig: "Re: OpenVMS and Security - REALLY !!!!!"
- Previous message: Phillip Helbig: "Re: SMTP authentification"
- Maybe in reply to: Phillip Helbig: "SMTP authentification"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Phillip Helbig <HELBPHI@sysdev.deutsche-boerse.com> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 12:21:44 +0100 (MET)
> I just went through a similar exercise, moving from one DSL to another.
> After lots of trepidations, everything seems to be working fine now. The
> only distinction I can see is I requested a static IP (over here you
> have a choice of dynamic or static for about the same price).
Out of curiosity, what is that price?
> 1. Setup my LAN IPs - result:
> 2. Establish the BIND Name routes - result:
> 3. Setup the default gateway - result:
> 4. Setup a substitute domain and zone - result:
> Alternate gateway: not defined
> General gateway: not defined
>
> Substitute domain: HIDDEN, ALPHASE.COM
> Zone: ALPHASE.COM
> ---------
>
> Now all mail is routed through the default gateway. I did not have to
> configure any special mail gateways. I know you were asking how to do
> this using *dynamic* IPs, but I thought this might help you, or others,
> who may give up on the dynamic method.
This will work as long as you're IP address is not rejected for some
reason. As others have mentioned, "dial-up" or "dynamic" address ranges
are often blocked wholesale by various mail routers.
All in all, a good summary of what to do!
- Next message: Phillip Helbig: "Re: OpenVMS and Security - REALLY !!!!!"
- Previous message: Phillip Helbig: "Re: SMTP authentification"
- Maybe in reply to: Phillip Helbig: "SMTP authentification"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
