Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)
From: Paul Sture (p_sture_at_elias.decus.ch)
Date: 05/25/03
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: Overclocking VAXen"
- Previous message: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Maybe in reply to: Jeff Walters: "NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Next in thread: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Reply: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 May 03 09:40:15 +0200
In article <qMOdnfwqZcQmuU2jXTWcpA@metrocast.net>, "Bill Todd" <billtodd@metrocast.net> writes:
<snip>
> NT probably does have a somewhat closer relationship to VMS than what I'd
> write for a record manager today would have to RMS,
Out of curiosity, what features would you put into a new RMS, and is there
anything in particular you would drop? As this is a theoretical question,
I'm not especially concerned with backwards compatibilty.
-- Paul Sture
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: Overclocking VAXen"
- Previous message: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Maybe in reply to: Jeff Walters: "NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Next in thread: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Reply: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|