Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)
From: JF Mezei (jfmezei.spamnot_at_istop.com)
Date: 05/26/03
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: FREE TO A GOOD HOME"
- Previous message: David J. Dachtera: "Re: Samba for OpenVMS How-To?"
- In reply to: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Next in thread: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Reply: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 22:21:51 -0400
Bill Todd wrote:
> I think I'd get rid of RFA mechanisms in indexed files:
Why ?
In the case of all-in-1, RFA allows one to access records with duplicate keys
and also saves a lot of time when you've already looked up one record and have
stored its RFA in a local variable.
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: FREE TO A GOOD HOME"
- Previous message: David J. Dachtera: "Re: Samba for OpenVMS How-To?"
- In reply to: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Next in thread: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Reply: Bill Todd: "Re: NT: son of VMS? (was Re: Portents of VMS death)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
