Re: Portents of VMS death
From: jlsue (jefflsxxxz_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 05/28/03
- Next message: Holi - Holitska András: "Re: Need OpenVMS (any version)"
- Previous message: David Webb: "Re: How to make a shadowed system disk"
- In reply to: JF Mezei: "Re: Portents of VMS death"
- Next in thread: JF Mezei: "Re: Portents of VMS death"
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: Portents of VMS death"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 16:30:52 GMT
On Mon, 26 May 2003 13:58:56 -0400, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@istop.com>
wrote:
>
>But in the real world, if you have 2-3 nodes in your cluster, one production,
>one for testing/backup and one for quorum vote, you don't have that luxury.
>When the production node fails, you must start the production application on
>the backup node, and if the application has its own drivers, you need to first
>unlaod the test drivers and then reload the production ones. You need to reboot.
>
That's not a real-world cluster. That's an accident waiting to happen.
Clustering development/test systems with production is ludicrous design.
The *reason* for a cluster is a scalable, available server for
applications. That implies multiple servers providing access to the same
applications in a load-balanced way.
Fail-over clustering can be done by the cheapest crap out there. Those
configurations are not highly available and should not be implemented where
availability is a means to achieve certain business goals.
- Next message: Holi - Holitska András: "Re: Need OpenVMS (any version)"
- Previous message: David Webb: "Re: How to make a shadowed system disk"
- In reply to: JF Mezei: "Re: Portents of VMS death"
- Next in thread: JF Mezei: "Re: Portents of VMS death"
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: Portents of VMS death"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|