Re: Max length of Nodename in OpenVMS 7.31

From: Carl Perkins (carl_at_gerg.tamu.edu)
Date: 06/18/03


Date: 17 Jun 2003 20:56 CDT

In article <01KX7F38TCBOAOKN0V@sysdev.deutsche-boerse.com>, Phillip Helbig <HELBPHI@sysdev.deutsche-boerse.com> writes...
}> Does this have anything to do with the 6-character limit on the length
}> of variable names in Fortran prior to Fortran 90?
}
}> What planet did you lean Fortran on? Some early Fortran compilers had
}> a 6 character variable name limit, but this was fixed long before
}> Fortran 90.
}
}STANDARD Fortran had the 6-character limit for variable-name length
}until the Fortran 90 standard came out. Of course, longer variable
}names were available as compiler extensions with many compilers before
}this time.
}
}> And no, it has nothing to do with it.
}
}Just a guess! Parts of VMS are, I believe, written in Fortran.

What, exactly, would the length of the nodename have to do
with the length of a variable name? Do you think that somehwere in
NCL there is a way to make it write some Fortran source code that
uses the nodename as the name of a variable?

You might use the nodename as the *value* of a varaiable, but
when would you use it as the *name* of a variable?

--- Carl



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Max length of Nodename in OpenVMS 7.31
    ... > of variable names in Fortran prior to Fortran 90? ... STANDARD Fortran had the 6-character limit for variable-name length ... names were available as compiler extensions with many compilers before ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
    ... Some vendors phased out their F77 compilers over 10 ... No need to support a seperate F77 compiler as, ... experience with F77) that the F95 programming is safer than the F77 ... Authors are not chosing more recent Fortran ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: what is the most suitable Linux platform for Programmers and software developers
    ... C, C++, Perl, Python, Lisp, and a bunch of other languages are supported ... There are FORTRAN compilers, but FORTRAN ... Look at the Linux ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
    ... Some vendors phased out their F77 compilers over 10 ... No need to support a seperate F77 compiler as, ... experience with F77) that the F95 programming is safer than the F77 ... COMMONs remain available with any FORTRAN version. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Declaration to get 8-bit (or 16-bit) integer?
    ... Supported by all the current compilers that I've tried it on. ... Not likely to become standard in the foreseeable future. ... Syntax standard-conforming, but semantics not guaranteed of course. ... The meaning of the code not obvious to anyone but a Fortran guru. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)