Re: Itanium performance news...
From: Bill Todd (billtodd_at_metrocast.net)
Date: 07/31/03
- Next message: Alan Winston - SSRL Admin Cmptg Mgr: "Re: [Change topic -> OT] Pence/Pennies"
- Previous message: Carlc Internet Services: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- In reply to: Fred Kleinsorge: "Itanium performance news..."
- Next in thread: JF Mezei: "Re: Itanium performance news..."
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: Itanium performance news..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:04:53 -0400
"Fred Kleinsorge" <my-last-name@stardotzko.dec.com> wrote in message
news:IwVVa.1140$044.460@news.cpqcorp.net...
> This just came across my screen in e-mail:
>
> HP and Oracle Set Transaction Processing World Record - Break 800K Barrier
> HP Integrity Servers and Oracle Database Establish Record-breaking
> Benchmarks on Multiple Operating Systems Across Diverse Workloads
>
> PALO ALTO, CALIF., JULY 30, 2003
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- > ---- > > HP (NYSE:HPQ) and Oracle Corp. (Nasdaq:ORCL) today announced the > world-record benchmark result of 824,164 transactions per minute (tpmC) on > the Transaction Processing Council's TPC-C benchmark(1) achieved by the > first ever system, clustered or non-clustered, to eclipse the 800K tpmC > barrier. Amazing! A SuperDome with 64 top-of-the-line Madisons has managed to post a tpmC score almost 8% higher than IBM's POWER4+ system achieves with half as many processors. An Itanic accomplishment, indeed! > > An HP Integrity Superdome server with 64 IntelŪ ItaniumŪ 2 processors 6M > running the 64-bit HP-UX 11i v2 operating system, HP StorageWorks Virtual > Array 7110 and Oracle Database technology Well, I guess that pretty much puts to rest the theory advanced by some that the poor scaling up of the earlier SuperDome TPC-C results was mostly due to the use of Windows and SQL Server - which generated 5.84x the performance with 16x the processors (compared with the 4-processor zx1 system), while the new HP-UX system generates 6.26x the performance with 16x the processors. Even if we derate the 4-processor HP-UX system a bit (based on other TPC-C scores around 5% seems reasonable) to compensate for its having 96 GB of memory vs. the 64 GB for the only slightly-lower-performing Windows system, the scaling is still under 6.6:1 for a 16:1 system size increase (about 1.6x the performance for each doubling of processor count). outperformed all competitive > offerings for transaction processing, while also delivering a top 10 TPC-C > single-system price to performance ratio for high-end system of > $8.28/tpmC.(1) Vs. $8.31/tpmC for the IBM offering with similar capacity. > > "HP's strong alliance and strategic development with Oracle enables us to > deliver performance that firmly establishes HP Integrity servers as the > standard for 64-bit architectures," said Rich Marcello Some people might suggest that claiming to be 'the standard' with effectively zero market penetration was just a *bit* of a stretch... ... > Record Result for Oracle Applications Standard Benchmark > > HP and Oracle also established a new world record for the Oracle > Applications Standard Benchmark (OASB) on four-processor systems. The HP > Integrity rx5670 server running HP-UX 11i v2 and Oracle Database achieved > 6,440 concurrent users, with an average response time of 0.6 seconds.(3) How nice - but this result was published over a month ago. I guess they needed something to fill out the press release and didn't just want to use the lower Linux score that they released today. But even the better HP-UX benchmark result doesn't bode well for SuperDome: IBM's 16-processor system generates over 3.41x the score of HP's 4-processor zx1, and given how poorly SuperDome appears to scale (if the TPC-C scaling holds here one might expect about 2.56x the 4-processor score at 16 processors) it may have considerable difficulty matching that (let alone in larger configurations). - bill
- Next message: Alan Winston - SSRL Admin Cmptg Mgr: "Re: [Change topic -> OT] Pence/Pennies"
- Previous message: Carlc Internet Services: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- In reply to: Fred Kleinsorge: "Itanium performance news..."
- Next in thread: JF Mezei: "Re: Itanium performance news..."
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: Itanium performance news..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|