Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)
From: JF Mezei (jfmezei.nospam_at_istop.com)
Date: 07/31/03
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: Itanium performance news..."
- Previous message: JF Mezei: "Re: Sun tries to woo AlphaServer users away from HP"
- In reply to: Carlc Internet Services: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- Next in thread: Michael Moroney: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- Reply: Michael Moroney: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:49:53 -0400
Carlc Internet Services wrote:
> I wish the OpenVMS systems could do this as well, instead, I just use them
> for relaying of known IP addresses, denying all other relays.
TCPIP Services 5.3 supports RBLs.
And I would suspect that the more complete Multinet/PMDF would too.
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: Itanium performance news..."
- Previous message: JF Mezei: "Re: Sun tries to woo AlphaServer users away from HP"
- In reply to: Carlc Internet Services: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- Next in thread: Michael Moroney: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- Reply: Michael Moroney: "Re: SMTP greylisting (was Re: Teergrube for VMS ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]