Re: IA64 to be dual core by 2005
From: John Santos (JOHN_at_egh.com)
Date: 09/20/03
- Previous message: Wayne Sewell: "Re: A flood of spams - another virus on the way?"
- In reply to: John Smith: "Re: IA64 to be dual core by 2005"
- Next in thread: Paul Repacholi: "Re: IA64 to be dual core by 2005"
- Reply: Paul Repacholi: "Re: IA64 to be dual core by 2005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:54:27 -0400
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, John Smith wrote:
> Then there's this article and quote.....
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1269660,00.asp
>
> Intel CTO: Desktop Isn't Ready for 64 Bits
> By Mark Hachman
> September 15, 2003
>
>
> SAN JOSE, Calif.-Sixty-four bit computing won't be needed on desktop
> PCs for several more years, according to Pat Gelsinger, chief technology
> officer at Intel Corp. ......
>
> ie. no volume in the 64-bit market from Intel for years.....read
> higher prices....read lower adoption rates...
Intel said the exact same thing about Pentiums when they were introduced.
"Pentiums are for servers. Desktop users should stick with 486." they
said. We all know how long that lasted. The only diffence was there
then there was a lot of clamor from users (mostly gamers) for
Pentium desktops. I don't know how much current gamers care about
IPF, AMD-64, or 64 bits in general.
-- John Santos Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539
- Previous message: Wayne Sewell: "Re: A flood of spams - another virus on the way?"
- In reply to: John Smith: "Re: IA64 to be dual core by 2005"
- Next in thread: Paul Repacholi: "Re: IA64 to be dual core by 2005"
- Reply: Paul Repacholi: "Re: IA64 to be dual core by 2005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|