Re: AMD64 sales figures
From: JF Mezei (jfmezei.spamnot_at_istop.com)
Date: 10/03/03
- Next message: Robert Deininger: "Re: DS15 systems have arrived"
- Previous message: Jan-Erik Söderholm: "Re: SMTP receiver logs"
- In reply to: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: AMD64 sales figures"
- Next in thread: Keith Parris: "Re: AMD64 sales figures"
- Reply: Keith Parris: "Re: AMD64 sales figures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 05:39:59 -0400
Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy wrote:
> MS only needs one 64bit desktop architecture it doesn't need two.
If Intel is forced to continue development of IA64 even if it releases a 64
bit 8086 to compete against AMD, it is likely that Intel will fund Microsoft's
continued support of Windows on IA64.
On the other hand, once Carly is booted out of office, perhaps her replacement
will acknowledge that IA64 is to be relegated only to large servers
(essentially the same fate as Alpha) and that they will focus Windows on
commodity 64 bit chips (aka 8086). As soon as this is said, Microsoft will
stop developping for iA64 and focus on 32 and 64 bit 8086.
The big motivation for intel to go 64 bit is this:
Once Intel starts to produce 64 bit 8086s, Microsoft and others will start to
produce software that runs only on 64 bit machines. TYhis, like the Windows95
upgrades as well as Y2K will generate a big boom in computer sales since
people will need to upgrade hardware in order to get the latest version of
Word. This will be good for Microsoft and good for AMD and Intel.
As long as Intel continues to produce 32 bit 8086s whose performance is more
than needed for average users, then the need to upgrade machines/hardware will
be very low. The minute Intel stops making 32 bit 8086s, everyone will be
forced to upgrade in order to keep up with the jones'
The logical thing for Intel to do is to plan its 64 bit 8086 so it can have
the features such as lockstep etc required by large/serious systems. Once that
is available on the 8086, then Intel can put Ia64 out of its misery and
everyone concentrate on the 8086 which will be what Carly and Curly had
wanted: a commodity chip.
to Hoff and the other engineers: When Curly announced the murder of Alpha, we
were told here that the VMS engineers were as surprised as we were and that
they had had no advance warnings. Well, this time around, I think that the
writing is on the wall. As time progresses, it is less and less likely that
IA64 will survive in the face of a 64 bit commodity 8086 chip.
If IA64 supports EFI, what does AMD's 64 bit 8086 use as console software ?
Would/will intel copy AMD's console or would Intel use EFI for its 64 bit 8086 ?
- Next message: Robert Deininger: "Re: DS15 systems have arrived"
- Previous message: Jan-Erik Söderholm: "Re: SMTP receiver logs"
- In reply to: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: AMD64 sales figures"
- Next in thread: Keith Parris: "Re: AMD64 sales figures"
- Reply: Keith Parris: "Re: AMD64 sales figures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|