Re: Question about SMTP.CONFIG
From: Spud Demon (lewis_at_e.thundermaker.net)
Date: 10/07/03
- Next message: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Fee Based Email (From Re: Process's PreciseMail AntiSpam...)"
- Previous message: Galen Tackett: "Problem with CLUSTER_CONFIG? (was: Re: DIFVOLMNT (%X0072832C), then bugcheck whenbooting any node.)"
- In reply to: JF Mezei: "Re: Question about SMTP.CONFIG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:49:16 GMT
JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@istop.com> writes in article <3F80AE23.749DFDCC@istop.com> dated Sun, 05 Oct 2003 19:50:17 -0400:
>Correct. I also have the tcpip$smtp_local_aliases.txt populated with local
>host names. This allows those hosts to relay. (but not sure if this is
>included in Relay-zones:)
Thanks!
>> Any other anti-spam suggestions?
>Read the TCPIP Services management manual. It has full description of the SMTP
>configuration rules for anti-spam.
I did read it before I asked. I just wasn't sure if I understood
everything. This seems to be working reasonably well as is, I don't think I
need to use RBLs, which seems to be the only anti-spam feature which doesn't
come on by default once you create the config file.
Now if I only knew why my Usenet propagation was so piss-poor...
--Spud Demon spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net
- Next message: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Fee Based Email (From Re: Process's PreciseMail AntiSpam...)"
- Previous message: Galen Tackett: "Problem with CLUSTER_CONFIG? (was: Re: DIFVOLMNT (%X0072832C), then bugcheck whenbooting any node.)"
- In reply to: JF Mezei: "Re: Question about SMTP.CONFIG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]