Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!
From: JF Mezei (jfmezei.spamnot_at_istop.com)
Date: 10/25/03
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: DHCP serving more than one subnet (longish)"
- Previous message: Mark Berryman: "Re: DHCP serving more than one subnet (longish)"
- In reply to: Robert Deininger: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Next in thread: Neil Rieck: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Reply: Neil Rieck: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Reply: jlsue: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 21:32:12 -0400
Robert Deininger wrote:
> The Marvel systems went out the door with the best EV7 CPUs that could be
> produced at the time.
Yet, a few months later, HP admits that the current EV7 can be boosted by 15%
because existing productions of EV7 has shown its speed can be increased
without changes. Either the engineers were totally incompetent in estimating
the highest possible speed for their new EV7, or HP decided to lower the clock rate.
> After several passes of EV79 prototype chips, they did not _work_ at
> anything approaching the design speed. They were absolutely not ready to
> ship.
And EV79 wasn't meant to ship until next year. Heck,. EV7 systems have only
now beund to ship, you'd think they'd wait a while before unleashing its successor.
Unless, of course, their goals are not to get the most profits from their
alpha assets.
> post-2004. The problems were largely out of HP's control.
Sorry, I don't buy that. Compaq/HP should have known exaxctly what is involved
in a process shrink expecially with their supposedly so cosy relationship with
Intel. So when they commotted to EV79, they would have known what to expect.
If IBM can do it with Power, Sun with Sparc and Intel with 8086, HP should be
able to do it with Alpha. Note that EV79 was to have been just a process
schrink, not a logic/core change.
> Throwing tons
> of money at it wouldn't have fixed the schedule problem, at least not
> enough to matter.
Why are they in such a hurry ? They just unleashed EV7. Customers would be
more than happy to see Alpha's lifetime extended, especially since IA64 is so lackluster.
> EV79 was NOT a "process shrink", whatever that vague term might mean.
Well, how come the roadmap, "plan of record" and other propaganda attemps from
Compaq/HP spoke of a process shrink for EV79 ?
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: DHCP serving more than one subnet (longish)"
- Previous message: Mark Berryman: "Re: DHCP serving more than one subnet (longish)"
- In reply to: Robert Deininger: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Next in thread: Neil Rieck: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Reply: Neil Rieck: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Reply: jlsue: "Re: EV79 CANCELED !!!!!!!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|