Re: OpenVMS clusters give Windows, Unix thorough thrashing
From: Keith Parris (keithparris_NOSPAM_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/12/03
- Next message: Peter Weaver: "Re: Another search enhancement"
- Previous message: DumberThanSnot: "Re: Ping: VAXman"
- In reply to: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: OpenVMS clusters give Windows, Unix thorough thrashing"
- Next in thread: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: OpenVMS clusters give Windows, Unix thorough thrashing"
- Reply: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: OpenVMS clusters give Windows, Unix thorough thrashing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 12 Dec 2003 09:02:50 -0800
Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy <Andrew_No.Harrison_No@nospamn.sun.com> wrote in message news:<br9veh$kn1$2@new-usenet.uk.sun.com>...
> They can have dissaster tolerant clusters from Sun as well.
A Sun Cluster can either provide redundant servers within a site, or
you can have a single server in each of two sites (limit of 2 nodes in
the Sun Cluster in a disaster-tolerant configuration). So if you lose
a site, you no longer have server redundancy. So you can't have both
inter-site and intra-site redundancy at the same time. Difficult
choice to have to make.
- Next message: Peter Weaver: "Re: Another search enhancement"
- Previous message: DumberThanSnot: "Re: Ping: VAXman"
- In reply to: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: OpenVMS clusters give Windows, Unix thorough thrashing"
- Next in thread: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: OpenVMS clusters give Windows, Unix thorough thrashing"
- Reply: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: OpenVMS clusters give Windows, Unix thorough thrashing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|