Re: [OT] Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full
From: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy (Andrew_No.Harrison_No_at_nospamn.sun.com)
Date: 02/18/04
- Next message: Fred Kleinsorge: "Re: It is almost certain now, INTEL will have 64bit x86 !!"
- Previous message: Tillman, Brian (AGRE): "RE: Welcome Package for IV NEWBIES"
- In reply to: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: [OT] Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full"
- Next in thread: Fred Kleinsorge: "Re: [OT] Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full"
- Reply: Fred Kleinsorge: "Re: [OT] Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:51:38 +0000
david20@alpha2.mdx.ac.uk wrote:
> In article <c0vqgd$803$1@new-usenet.uk.sun.com>, Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy <Andrew_No.Harrison_No@nospamn.sun.com> writes:
>
>>david20@alpha2.mdx.ac.uk wrote:
>>
>>>You accuse others of trolling. In general those you accuse are users and/or
>>>supporters of VMS. You are neither a user or supporter.
>>>There are enough users and supporters of VMS who are able to provide balance
>>>on issues like IA64 without needing the support of someone whose agenda
>>>with respect to a bright future for VMS must seem a little suspect.
>>>
>>
>>What is the title of this thread ???????????????????????????
>>
>>Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full !
>>
>>So now you explain to me why I should not respond, or perhaps
>>explain why was this posted to this thread in the first place.
>>
>>Last time I looked comp.os.vms wasn't a Solaris admin newsgroup.
>>
>>Sorry but that really wasn't one of your best.
>>
>>I have snipped the rest of your post for your
>>benefit, you can thank me at your leisure.
>>
>
>
> As usual you snip to support your own position without regard to what was
> actually posted.
>
> As I posted
>
>
> "
> I know in this case you will argue that you were only defending Solaris.
> But why do you care ? This is a VMS newsgroup. In other newsgroups dedicated to
> other systems you will find critism of Windows, Linux, Solaris etc
> It's the nature of such newsgroups. Your presence almost certainly leads to
> more posting of critisms of Solaris in this newsgroup than would otherwise be
> the case.
> "
Chicken, egg. I am here because one Rob Young started an anti Sun
tirade to deflect criticism from the then owners of OpenVMS.
Rob could apologise and agree to stop spouting the same kind of BS
in the future but I very much doubt he will.
And I care because the anti Sun stuff was made up as is much of the
anti UNIX and Linux stuff and so should you because much of it
demonstrates a total ignorance of the platforms and products being
attacked.
Periodically Rob or some other chorister regurgitates the same
line having had it slapped down a few months or a year earlier
often as has been admitted to deflect further criticism from
OpenVMS's current owner.
This BS falls into certain predictable and always unsupported
categories.
The OpenVMS TCO BS
The OpenVMS CERT BS
The UNIX cluster BS
The AlphaServer performance BS
The SPARC is dead BS
The Slowaris BS
etc etc.
So let me ask you a question, do Bob's tirades trying to link
all Linux security issues with commercial UNIX platforms in an
attempt to FUD UNIX from a security standpoint strike
a chord with you or do you disagree with them ?
Do Robs everything sucks except Itanium tirades strike a chord
with you or do you disagree with them ? (a road to damascus
type conversion from everything sucks except Alpha).
Did the same tirade in favour of Alpha also garner the same
reaction from you ?
And if you disagreed with any of the rants above then why
didn't you say so ?
If you want me to stop posting to this group then you would
do better to direct your wrath at the more objectionable
elements in this group.
Regards
Andrew Harrison
- Next message: Fred Kleinsorge: "Re: It is almost certain now, INTEL will have 64bit x86 !!"
- Previous message: Tillman, Brian (AGRE): "RE: Welcome Package for IV NEWBIES"
- In reply to: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: [OT] Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full"
- Next in thread: Fred Kleinsorge: "Re: [OT] Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full"
- Reply: Fred Kleinsorge: "Re: [OT] Solaris crashes itself when /tmp is full"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|