Re: [TCPIP V5.4] Session Disconnects (and DISCONNECT)
From: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER (peter_at_langstoeger.at)
Date: 02/21/04
- Next message: Fabio Cardoso: "Re: Marketeering and Software Engineering (was: Re: Solved: "Known problems with V7.3 security MUP?""
- Previous message: jealous xmp: "Re: Port to forward behind ADSL router for DECWindows ?"
- In reply to: Matt Muggeridge: "Re: [TCPIP V5.4] Session Disconnects (and DISCONNECT)"
- Next in thread: Matt Muggeridge: "Re: [TCPIP V5.4] Session Disconnects (and DISCONNECT)"
- Reply: Matt Muggeridge: "Re: [TCPIP V5.4] Session Disconnects (and DISCONNECT)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:16:21 +0000 (UTC)
In article <8ncZb.67244$Wa.23019@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, "Matt Muggeridge" <Matt.Muggeridge@hp.com> writes:
>>When I delete the alias address(es) the sessions
>> (eg. DECnet over IP) don't get terminated.
>
>That is a good thing. Protocol modularity and all that.
I disagree. The address is gone, the sessions should too.
>> 1) Is there a chance that UCX at some time will do this right ?
>> eg. do you have an idea what parameters to try (besides how to do
>> keepalive for DECnet over IP)
>
>I'm not sure what your expectations are. Using "tcpip disconnect" seems the
>right approach. Your 3rd point suggests you would like to see this enhanced
>to accept /LOCAL and /REMOTE qualifiers for the port number.
Yes. But I want both.
A DISCONNECT is the 2nd choice. 1st is the automatic session termination.
>>Is there any chance that UCX will narrow this gap
>> (which exists now for a decade) in the very near future ?
>
>Sorry to say that I haven't seen this request on our recent requirements
>list.
Is this list done by user requests only ?
Or does some marketing guy occassionally look on competing products, too ?
I surely discussed it on more than one occasion (but didn't submit an SPR).
(And I still have the impression that PSC did add KILL CONNECTION on my own
request way back in the very early nineties)
> However, I will forward it along.
Thanks a lot.
> But before I do, is there more to
>it than:
>
> tcpip disco dev /LOCAL=<local port number> /REMOTE=<remote port number>
/LOCAL=<local-ia|*>.<local-port|*>
/REMOTE=<remote-ia|*>.<remote-port|*>
>Of course, like all work, this will be prioritised accordingly. You can
>check in periodically to see where it is up to. If you need our product
>manager's email address, drop me a line.
Dropped ;-)
Does he accept hobbyists, too ?
>>Otherwise I will
>> have to write a DCL script instead of using one simple TCPIP command...
>
>That will have to be your solution in the near term.
And this is a problem I'm afraid off.
eg. There is a difference between BG devices and sockets. F$DEVICE ("_BG*:")
So even getting a list of sockets is parsing output in files. Shudder.
>> 3) Is there a chance that a lexical function (F$GETDVI comes to mind) will
>> (in the very near future) give me IP information (like the local IP address
>> and/or port number) on BG devices ? Otherwise I will have to parse output
>> files (written by CRTL).
>
>In the very near future... no. If you can email me your requirement (the
>more detail the better) it will be added to our requirements list and
>reviewed during the next cycle.
Many Thanks.
I think the requirements should and will grow here in the news group...
>> Any hope ?
>
>There is always hope. Keep smiling. :-)
I already do. Such a fast answer. And from the right person. Wonderful...
-- Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER Network and OpenVMS system specialist E-mail peter@langstoeger.at A-1030 VIENNA AUSTRIA I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist
- Next message: Fabio Cardoso: "Re: Marketeering and Software Engineering (was: Re: Solved: "Known problems with V7.3 security MUP?""
- Previous message: jealous xmp: "Re: Port to forward behind ADSL router for DECWindows ?"
- In reply to: Matt Muggeridge: "Re: [TCPIP V5.4] Session Disconnects (and DISCONNECT)"
- Next in thread: Matt Muggeridge: "Re: [TCPIP V5.4] Session Disconnects (and DISCONNECT)"
- Reply: Matt Muggeridge: "Re: [TCPIP V5.4] Session Disconnects (and DISCONNECT)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|