Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable
From: Russell Wallace (wallacethinmintr_at_eircom.net)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: Tony Reed: "Re: The J F M e z e i F A Q"
- Previous message: Safir: "Re: This is a Last Mohican fight (was: [On-Topic]Inquirer: How the IT media manipulates the news)"
- In reply to: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Next in thread: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Reply: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:38:57 GMT
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:27:25 +0100, Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy
<Andrew_No.Harrison_No@nospamn.sun.com> wrote:
>Incedentally the Intergraph model is one that has been followed
>closely by SCO and anyone who thinks that a relatively small
>company cannot take big chunks out of a very large company
>for IP infringement and therefore SCO will fail to prevail
>against IBM simply on that basis is deluding themselves.
I don't think anyone's saying SCO will fail against IBM on that basis,
they're saying SCO will fail against IBM because they haven't so much
as the vaguest shred of a case.
-- "Sore wa himitsu desu." To reply by email, remove the small snack from address. http://www.esatclear.ie/~rwallace
- Next message: Tony Reed: "Re: The J F M e z e i F A Q"
- Previous message: Safir: "Re: This is a Last Mohican fight (was: [On-Topic]Inquirer: How the IT media manipulates the news)"
- In reply to: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Next in thread: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Reply: Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|