RE: [ot?]Trademark Alpha
From: Brian Tillman (tillmabg_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: Larry Kilgallen: "Re: DCL Coding Standards"
- Previous message: Bob Ceculski: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Maybe in reply to: Don Sykes: "[ot?]Trademark Alpha"
- Next in thread: Thomas Wirt: "Re: [ot?]Trademark Alpha"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:46:29 -0500
JF Mezei wrote:
> Perhaps this is just due diligence on their part to ensure that they
> are actively protecting their trademark and all that they expect is a
> friendly agreement between you two just to confirm that they have
> taken the steps to protect their trademark and that it was agreed
> that your use of the word alpha doesn't interfere with theirs.
Not a chance. Companies that SPAM or sell SPAM tools seem to be quite
determined to do maximum damage to anyone they perceive as being in their
way.
-- Brian Tillman
- Next message: Larry Kilgallen: "Re: DCL Coding Standards"
- Previous message: Bob Ceculski: "Re: Undeniable proof that Itanium is highly profitable"
- Maybe in reply to: Don Sykes: "[ot?]Trademark Alpha"
- Next in thread: Thomas Wirt: "Re: [ot?]Trademark Alpha"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]