Re: Routing question
From: glen herrmannsfeldt (gah_at_ugcs.caltech.edu)
Date: 04/16/04
- Next message: Alder: "Re: Linking XV for OpenVMS"
- Previous message: Dominic Olivastro: "Re: PCanywhere and VAX VMS"
- In reply to: Jeffrey Coffield: "Re: Routing question"
- Next in thread: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply: "Re: Routing question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:55:44 GMT
Jeffrey Coffield wrote:
> glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
>> Yes, that is how routing works. You can use RIP, or another
>> routing protocol, so that it will switch if one goes down.
> As far as I can see, this would still only use one of the lines to send
> data back. Someone outside this group mentioned a box that would
> aggregate multiple connections to the Internet but I am looking for a
> solution that doesn't have a single point of failure.
Yes. The advantage is that if one router is down it can
choose to route through the other. If you have a static
route, it won't do that.
-- glen
- Next message: Alder: "Re: Linking XV for OpenVMS"
- Previous message: Dominic Olivastro: "Re: PCanywhere and VAX VMS"
- In reply to: Jeffrey Coffield: "Re: Routing question"
- Next in thread: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply: "Re: Routing question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|