Re: An RMS feature I wish for
From: Hein (hein.nomail_at_hp.nomail.com)
Date: 05/05/04
- Next message: John Smith: "Re: Another sneak preview - V8.2"
- Previous message: Mark Schafer: "Re: Intel IA-64 Assembler"
- In reply to: Bill Todd: "Re: An RMS feature I wish for"
- Next in thread: DL Phillips: "Re: An RMS feature I wish for"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 10:05:02 -0400
"Bill Todd" <billtodd@metrocast.net> wrote in message
news:Hp-dnWLPF6ZR5gXdRVn-gg@metrocast.net...
>
> "DL Phillips" <whohe@whoever.com> wrote in message
> news:af0dc2ea.0405041331.5ae2624a@posting.google.com...
> > RMS/FDL KEY definition, a way to index only records having a specific
> > matching string or value.
:
> I'm curious, and not sure I understand.
:
> but unless there are a great many of them this should not be too
burdensome
Reply collision. :-) similar thoughts, similar time, from a similiar
place.
> If some records don't want to be indexed at all, just duplicate the
> type code byte such that unindexed records can use the null key value in
the leading key byte.
My thought too, but you expressed it more clearly.
(Actually I lost a partial reply that did write it clearly. Grhhh... F*&$_*
Windows!)
> I don't know whether it was the advent of Rdb that more or less stopped
RMS development,
No, not really. RDB came more from RDBMS with new insights (Date and Codd) ,
not RMS.
- though key compression and IIRC
Yes
-single-key, no-RFA files did).
No. That one is still on my personal wish list. I'll buble it up again!
> the ability to associate arbitrary keys (potentially including multiple
instances
> in the same index) with each record
No. Allthough I might not fully understand you description.
Anyway the answer is still likely no, unless it just refers to 'segmented
keys'.
Segmented keys allow one to use the same segments (offset+length) from a
record in multiple combinations to create multiple 'overlapping' indexes,,,
but each index structures is entirely independend.
> an 'external key' mechanism rather than the current embedded-key variety,
> which among other uses and in conjunction with a no-primary-key file,
> where records were organized in a flexibly-managed bucket chain
No. Some applications build similar structures using RFA's to associate an
index file with an (optionally indexed) datafile. RMS stuck to the single
file solution.
fwiw,
Hein.
- Next message: John Smith: "Re: Another sneak preview - V8.2"
- Previous message: Mark Schafer: "Re: Intel IA-64 Assembler"
- In reply to: Bill Todd: "Re: An RMS feature I wish for"
- Next in thread: DL Phillips: "Re: An RMS feature I wish for"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|