Re: SUN fails to advertise VMS...

From: John Smith (a_at_nonymous.com)
Date: 05/19/04 

Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:03:56 -0400

"William Webb" <williamwebb@openvms-rocks.com> wrote in message
news:bf98c417.0405190539.7038255@posting.google.com...
> "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> wrote in message
news:<GuSdnbaB54ZlMjfdRVn-ig@igs.net>...
> > "Bob Ceculski" <bob@instantwhip.com> wrote in message
> > news:d7791aa1.0405181519.1cf087d@posting.google.com...
> > > Andrew Harrison SUNUK Consultancy
<Andrew_No.Harrison_No@nospamn.sun.com>
> > wrote in message news:<c8dfbl$p5u$3@new-usenet.uk.sun.com>...
> > > > >
> > > > > Having a bad day?
> > > >
> > > > Why would pointing out Bobs very obvious failings be
> > > > a symptom of me having a bad day ?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > Andrew Harrison
> > >
> > > the only thing you are pointing out is your desperation to
> > > trash the only os that can't get viruses and has 13 irrelevant
> > > certs in 13 years (i.e. decwindows) because your company and
> > > every other one out there is selling patch of the day club
> > > memberships in the form of unix/linux/windoze ...
> >
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > Somehow I don't think that going on about this time after time with
Andrew
> > will convince him any time soon that he should run out and buy VMS for
use
> > in his company, even though Andrew knows in his heart that you are
correct
> > ;-)
> >
> > You'd be of greater service to OpenVMS by convincing all your company's
> > suppliers and customers to come over to VMS. Statistically you'll have a
> > better chance of doing that than getting Andrew to change his view.
> >
> > John
>
> But if he [Andrew] argues with us, he MUST take up a contrary position...

While Andrew argues with Bob, he debates with the rest of us.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast