Re: [DECset V12.5] Current LSE/SCA version ?
From: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER (peter_at_langstoeger.at)
Date: 05/31/04
- Next message: John Santos: "Re: long, boring explanation of minicopy (and HBVS, in general)"
- Previous message: John Santos: "Re: failed CXX installation?"
- In reply to: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply: "Re: [DECset V12.5] Current LSE/SCA version ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 07:06:11 +0000 (UTC)
In article <c9d7i1$tdp$2@online.de>, helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply) writes:
>In article <newscache$9lfjyh$0br$1@news.sil.at>, peter@langstoeger.at
>(Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER) writes:
>> Now a (rhetorical) question:
>>
>> In previous occurences I found every time the version of LSE (Language
>> Sensitive Editor) and SCA (Source Code Analyzer) identical. Even this
>> time, SPL lists both as one item with UPI 057AA and version V4.8 (which
>> is contained in DECset V12.5).
>>
>> I did install DECset (months ago) and found that LSE is V4.8 and SCA is V4.7
>> Now, is there a SCA V4.8 ?
>
>For a long time, Fortran and VMS had the same version numbes, but I
>believe that has changed now.
If they are/were not sold under the same UPI, this is not exactly the same ;-)
-- Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER Network and OpenVMS system specialist E-mail peter@langstoeger.at A-1030 VIENNA AUSTRIA I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist
- Next message: John Santos: "Re: long, boring explanation of minicopy (and HBVS, in general)"
- Previous message: John Santos: "Re: failed CXX installation?"
- In reply to: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply: "Re: [DECset V12.5] Current LSE/SCA version ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|