Re: Oracle statement of direction
From: Richard Maher (maher_rj_at_hotspamnotmail.com)
Date: 06/05/04
- Previous message: Paul Sture: "Re: few questions"
- Next in thread: Norman Lastovica: "Re: Oracle statement of direction"
- Reply: Norman Lastovica: "Re: Oracle statement of direction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:46:53 +0000 (UTC)
C'mon Norm, do I really have to raise a TAR to find this out?
Yes, I am pretty sure that even your Row-Cache fuelled pathological
indifference to all things Clusters could not drive you to force loyal
Rdb/VMS customers into a Big-Bang conversion approach. And there's obviously
no need for me to tell everyone here about the benefits of a
mix-architecture clusters and the convenience (more often than not
necessity) of porting one application, or part there of, at a time to
itanium while still being able to access the same data from their tried and
test bank of Alpha/VAX applications. But my paranoia has me hearing voices
that sound a lot like Bill Gettys saying some bull*** like "Rdb engineering
has taken this opportunity to reorganize the internal page format in the
database to exploit fully the performance features of the new itanium
architecture and to convert some word and longword constructs to quadwords
to solve VLDB issues." _or_ "Having consulted extensively with our client
base(1) we've realized that most customers will be deploying strictly "new"
applications on there itanium hardware and will be gradually phasing out
their existing Alpha hardware. While we at Rdb engineering will continue to
support Alpha/Rdb for many years to come we will not be supporting
mix-architecture clusters at this time due to lack of demand. This will
allow us to concentrate our resources on exploiting fully the features of
the itanium architecture such as Row-Cache."
If you let 'em get their hands on clusters at this stage you may never get
them back to Row-Cache. You must do whatever it takes to stop this from this
from happening!! Save these stupid cluster worshippers from themselves!!!
Regards Richard Maher
(1) "Client Base" - The same sycophantic ring-kissers you always speak to
get the answers you want.
Richard Maher <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7igko$7n4$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> Hi Norm,
>
> > With these releases, both database and applications will run entirely
> > on Itanium.
>
> I just re-read your note and wanted to check on something. I'm pretty sure
> that your comment above was just refering to the time when an rdb$remote
> attachment to an Alpha would no longer be a *requirement* but can you
> confirm that the on-disk structure of Rdb databases on Itanium will not
> differ from those on VMS and mixed-architecture cluster support will be
> there from year dot?
>
> Regards Richard Maher
>
> PS. Does anyone know the final outcome of VMS engineering support for
VAXes
> in a mixed-architecture cluster with Itanium? Last I heard (I think from
> Hoff) was something like "We're not doing anything to break it but won't
be
> certifying it will work".
>
> Norman Lastovica <norman.lastovica@oracle.com> wrote in message
> news:40925215.7DF1FB34@oracle.com...
> > It would be proper and correct to read into the document that
> > Oracle Rdb and Oracle Database on OpenVMS are developed by two
> > different groups at Oracle who do not necessarily include each
> > other in their public statements about their respective products.
> >
> > In fact, the port of Rdb to Itanium is well underway. We are
> > soliciting volunteers who will bring application code and Rdb
> > databases to the OpenVMS Boot Camp in Nashua. We will work with
> > them to port their code to Itanium processors at that event.
> >
> > We expect to release an ADK this quarter that will allow customers
> > to compile their applications on Itanium while using Rdb's remote
> > access capabilities to read and write data on an Alpha processor.
> > We expect to release two beta test versions of Rdb on Itanium before
> > a final production release in the second quarter of next year.
> > With these releases, both database and applications will run entirely
> > on Itanium. Of course, we continue to support Rdb on VAX & Alpha
> > processors as well (though active, 'new feature' work on the VAX
> > is declining).
> >
> > - - - - -
> > opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone
> > and certainly are not intended in any way to
> > express or represent any opinions or commitment
> > of oracle corporation.
> >
> > norman lastovica / oracle rdb engineering
>
>
- Previous message: Paul Sture: "Re: few questions"
- Next in thread: Norman Lastovica: "Re: Oracle statement of direction"
- Reply: Norman Lastovica: "Re: Oracle statement of direction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]