Volume shadowing between FC Storage at different sites, and the allocation class
From: Andrew Rycroft (andrew.rycroft_at_intrinsitech.com)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Paul Repacholi: "Re: Intel Itanium's very survival in doubt - inquirer article"
- Previous message: CJT: "Re: Intel Itanium's very survival in doubt - inquirer article"
- Next in thread: Lee: "Re: Volume shadowing between FC Storage at different sites, and the allocation class"
- Reply: Lee: "Re: Volume shadowing between FC Storage at different sites, and the allocation class"
- Reply: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER: "Re: Volume shadowing between FC Storage at different sites, and the allocation class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Jun 2004 00:48:22 -0700
Hi,
I have just connected to some Fibrechannel based storage from my VMS
system. I see all the devices as $1$DGAxxx. Even thought the ALLOCLASS
parameter is 6 for the system.
This system will be in a cluster with a system at a remote site also
connected to FC storage, and I am sure I will also see the devices as
$1$DGAxxx.
I want to use Volume Shadowing to mirror the two sites, but I am a bit
concerned that because the allocation class is 1 for fibre channel
storage at both sites this may cause confusion for the cluster
software.
If anybody else has done this or has suggestions I would appreciate
the feedback.
With regards
Andrew
- Next message: Paul Repacholi: "Re: Intel Itanium's very survival in doubt - inquirer article"
- Previous message: CJT: "Re: Intel Itanium's very survival in doubt - inquirer article"
- Next in thread: Lee: "Re: Volume shadowing between FC Storage at different sites, and the allocation class"
- Reply: Lee: "Re: Volume shadowing between FC Storage at different sites, and the allocation class"
- Reply: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER: "Re: Volume shadowing between FC Storage at different sites, and the allocation class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|