Re: Accuweather video mentions VMS (TWICE!)
From: leslie (LESLIE_at_JRLVAX.HOUSTON.RR.COM)
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: Stonepounder: "ATTN: Jim Strehlow"
- Previous message: Nigel Barker: "Re: New vms install, problem with serial console opa0"
- In reply to: Roger Fraser: "Re: Accuweather video mentions VMS (TWICE!)"
- Next in thread: Tim Llewellyn: "Re: Accuweather video mentions VMS (TWICE!)"
- Reply: Tim Llewellyn: "Re: Accuweather video mentions VMS (TWICE!)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 11:51:25 GMT
Roger Fraser (roger.fraser@baesystems.com) wrote:
:
:
: And you need to underline:
: 1. VMS is virtually unhackable
: 2. VMS clusters stay available to users even through hardware and/or
: software upgrades
: 3. A cluster spread over a "reasonable" distance can survive a bomb taking
: out one site. Most users would only notice a small pause while the cluster
: reconfigures (unless they happen to be directly connected to the site taken
: out).
:
: Why isn't that thrown at every major corporation and government?
:
Because it would make Microsoft look bad ?
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11108
Microsoft cerebrates fifteen years of poor security
--Jerry Leslie
Note: leslie@jrlvax.houston.rr.com is invalid for email
- Next message: Stonepounder: "ATTN: Jim Strehlow"
- Previous message: Nigel Barker: "Re: New vms install, problem with serial console opa0"
- In reply to: Roger Fraser: "Re: Accuweather video mentions VMS (TWICE!)"
- Next in thread: Tim Llewellyn: "Re: Accuweather video mentions VMS (TWICE!)"
- Reply: Tim Llewellyn: "Re: Accuweather video mentions VMS (TWICE!)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
