Re: Turn-key OpenVMS E-mail, web server solution?
jf.pieronne_at_laposte.net
Date: 07/16/04
- Next message: Ken Fairfield: "Re: Node A dismounting its system disk from other nodes"
- Previous message: Martin Vorlaender: "Re: Need Help with SNMP"
- In reply to: Michael Austin: "Re: Turn-key OpenVMS E-mail, web server solution?"
- Next in thread: Michael Austin: "Re: Turn-key OpenVMS E-mail, web server solution?"
- Reply: Michael Austin: "Re: Turn-key OpenVMS E-mail, web server solution?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:39:05 +0200
Michael Austin wrote:
> JF Mezei wrote:
>
>> David J Dachtera wrote:
>>
>>> Is anyone aware of a company prodiving a turn-key OpenVMS solution for
>>> e-mail, web services and/or both?
>>
>>
>>
>>> The time for such seems to be ripening, and if Itanic can repair its
>>> hull, pump out and put itself to rights, OVMS-I64 may be a practical
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Forgetting discussions about IA64's future or lack thereof, the more
>> important
>> question is whether the TCPIP services on VMS will ever catch up with
>> industry
>> (aka: Unix).
>>
>> If HP is unwilling to put sufficient resources to complete the
>> revamping of
>> UCX into "TCPIP Services" and move that product into an industry leading
>> posistion, then it should abandon that product and simply bundle
>> Multinet and
>> PMDF with every VMS installation.
>>
>> Having said this, the answer to your question probably lies with Process
>> Software who are more likely to know who can do such a turnkey install
>> of a
>> VMS box with good TCPIP stack and services.
>
>
> I have been on systems using Multinet and TCPIP5.3+ and quite frankly, I
> found Multinet more difficult when deciphering particular parts of a
> configuration. TCPIP comes bundled with VMS these days (at least the
> last time I checked) and moving more towards **ix style commands, I find
> it quite easy to manipulate with the TCPIP set... commands and tweak
> parameters using sysconfig and netstat etc...
>
> On the Calendaring issue, if you are considering Exchange, then you ARE
> talking about Intranet. Not Internet. Yahmail is okay as an internet
> mail reader, but not very elegant - when was the last time you saw apps
> with "basic" or non-existant graphics and like it or not, people want
> pretty not just functional.
>
Found webcalendar, from the home page:
WebCalendar is a PHP-based calendar application that can be configured as a
single-user calendar, a multi-user calendar for groups of users, or as an
event calendar viewable by visitors.
http://webcalendar.sourceforge.net/
Install and run out of the box on VMS
I have build a demo system:
http://www.pi-net.dyndns.org/calendar/index.php
use demo/demo as username/password (may be remove at any time)
> I prefer just functional, but when you are dealing with the masses,
> unless it looks good and has all the bells and whistles and is also
> functional, you won't get a second chance to make the sale.
>
> Again, why is Process not porting their new offering to VMS?
>
- Next message: Ken Fairfield: "Re: Node A dismounting its system disk from other nodes"
- Previous message: Martin Vorlaender: "Re: Need Help with SNMP"
- In reply to: Michael Austin: "Re: Turn-key OpenVMS E-mail, web server solution?"
- Next in thread: Michael Austin: "Re: Turn-key OpenVMS E-mail, web server solution?"
- Reply: Michael Austin: "Re: Turn-key OpenVMS E-mail, web server solution?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|