Re: Galaxy shared memory size

From: Mike Naime (mnaime_at_kc.rr.com)
Date: 07/21/04


Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:13:24 GMT

Scott:

We stopped using Galaxy because we need a CD drive for
installation/upgrade/maintenance reasons. If you do not need the physical
devices that belong to the primary galaxy instance, then go for it.

I have not setup shared memory on my 1280's. All of my systems are (hard
implicit) soft partitions. What I found when partitioning a 1280 was that
the memory allocation was linked to the CPU's that are active in the
partitions. This is because the CPU "Owns" the memory installed into it's
CPU drawer. So, when you install the hardware, you have to really look at
how you might want to partition it, and move your memory dimms accordingly.

Mike Naime

Scott Greig <jsgreig@geminaq.com> wrote in message
news:XD9Lc.16493$Vw3.943614@news20.bellglobal.com...
> Hello all
>
> I'm about to configure my first Galaxy (ES47 Model 4).
> My thought was to have a single hard partition, with
> two soft partitions, using SMCI (Shared Memory Cluster
> Interconnect) as the cluster interconnect.
>
> There will only be 4 GB of memory. Both instances
> will boot from a common system disk - applications
> will also share disks (MSA1000).
>
> I'm considering a 64MB shared memory area, but this is
> only a guess - I have no guidelines (nor are there any in
> the Alpha Partitioning and Galaxy Guide).
>
> My question - is this enough? Should I consider 128MB?
> The application is NOT Galaxy aware - at least not yet!
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mac running Windows XP operating system
    ... The CPU may lend itself to facilitating this ... But IBM mainframes have also supported hardware partitions for at least that long, so you could have, for example, separate versions of the same OS running concurrently on the same system. ... I've heard stories more recently of IBM's current offering, z/OS, running multiple instances of Linux. ... OpenVMS Galaxy systems. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: SSAS 2005 perform worse performance that 2000
    ... The slicer parameter is recommended but optionnal for your partitions ... recomend change memory settings. ... Our cube files takes about 35 GB, but database Estimated Size from cube ... queries from cache filtered 500000, Total queries from cache direct 30000. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap)
  • Re: Hey FN!!! - Re: Aldi offer from 4th August
    ... one, just the basics were different like memory, HD etc. ... > But it does come with a DVB TV Tuner Card & also an Analogue ... > You could try having a look on the Medion Site? ... > & Re-Arrange the Partitions, ...
    (uk.people.silversurfers)
  • Re: SSAS 2005 perform worse performance that 2000
    ... sql server and leave all SSAS memory options default because MS does not ... recomend change memory settings. ... queries from cache filtered 500000, Total queries from cache direct 30000. ... read abouty this option I need to set only for ROLAP partitions. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.olap)
  • Re: Show Memory/phys
    ... >Private/shared memory and main memory ??? ... private is the memory visible only to one processor. ... Shared memory is visible to all of the processors in the "galaxy". ... This configuration is most likely usable only for programming types develop- ...
    (comp.os.vms)

Loading