Re: why mainframes are still used?
From: David M Smith (dsmit115_at_csc.com)
Date: 09/10/04
- Next message: _at_SendSpamHere.ORG: "I'm giving up computers if this is the future."
- Previous message: David M Smith: "Re: why mainframes are still used?"
- In reply to: Tom Linden: "RE: why mainframes are still used?"
- Next in thread: Nigel Barker: "Re: why mainframes are still used?"
- Reply: Nigel Barker: "Re: why mainframes are still used?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:02:59 -0400
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:51:38 -0700, "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.com> wrote:
>
>
<snip>
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/2004
Tom -- if it's all the same to you, I would love for you to change your "quote"
character in your newsreader from < to >. It would make reading your posts so
much easier (for me, and maybe others).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
David M. Smith 302.391.8533 dsmit115 at csc dot com
Computer Sciences Corporation (Opinions are those of the writer only)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: _at_SendSpamHere.ORG: "I'm giving up computers if this is the future."
- Previous message: David M Smith: "Re: why mainframes are still used?"
- In reply to: Tom Linden: "RE: why mainframes are still used?"
- Next in thread: Nigel Barker: "Re: why mainframes are still used?"
- Reply: Nigel Barker: "Re: why mainframes are still used?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
