Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???
_at_SendSpamHere.ORG
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Alan Greig: "Re: Future of Decnet"
- Previous message: Alan Frisbie: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- In reply to: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Next in thread: labadie: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:23:12 GMT
In article <415AF401.CDBA2B3C@teksavvy.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> writes:
>VAXman-, @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>> It doesn't answer my question/issue but does demonstrate that you are rather
>> fond of chocolate, a cad idiot and a sloppy fellatio performing homely girl.
>
>Insults apart, I was trying to explain to you that there is no such thing as a
>"CC" list in SMTP. The actual recipients are all treated the same in RCPT TO:
>commands at the top of the file. The TO: and CC: lines in the header below the
>DATA command are not treated.
>
>But i guess it is pointless to try to help you.
Sheesh... get a sense of humor JF.
I still send mail from this costomer's system using this program and get dup
emails for the CC.
-- http://www.ProvN.com for the *best* OpenVMS system security solutions that others only claim to be. -- Cyber-Terrorism (si'-ber tayr'-or-iz-em) n.: The release of, the sale of, or the use of any Micro$oft software product! -- VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM
- Next message: Alan Greig: "Re: Future of Decnet"
- Previous message: Alan Frisbie: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- In reply to: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Next in thread: labadie: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]