Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???
From: Alan Frisbie (Usenet01REMOVE_at_Flying-Disk.com)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: David Froble: "Re: As seen in WSJ"
- Previous message: David J Dachtera: "Re: *.CDD file for CONNX"
- In reply to: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Next in thread: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:19:54 -0700
Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing wrote:
> Hoff has already given a good answer for using the send-from-file services.
> But it also doesn't take any elevated privileges to connect to an SMTP server
> (try telnetting to port 25 and see), and once you do that you can put in any
> From: address you like.
This is what I have done as a work-around for now, but it
isn't as "robust" as I would like it. In the process of
debugging it, I found that HP's implementation of SMTP has
some error (and non-error) codes that differ from Sendmail.
I'll try Hoff's suggestion and see how that works.
> There's nothing magic about Perl, and you could use the same tricks in other
> languages (except for an absence of socket support in DCL); this is just a
> handy routine that already works.
I did it in DEC BASIC since the application was already written
in it. It was an, er, education. :-)
Alan
- Next message: David Froble: "Re: As seen in WSJ"
- Previous message: David J Dachtera: "Re: *.CDD file for CONNX"
- In reply to: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Next in thread: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP$SMTP_SEND_FROM_FILE, what's its future???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|