Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows
From: Keith Parris (keithparris_NOSPAM_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/09/04
- Next message: John Smith: "HP offerings - but not for VMS"
- Previous message: david20_at_alpha1.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- In reply to: Warren Spencer: "Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Next in thread: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Reply: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Reply: Dean Woodward: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:25:46 GMT
Warren Spencer wrote:
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/11/09/HNskipitanium_1.html
And folks who feel that because Microsoft is choosing to support 64-bit
extensions to x86 first and Itanium later for this Compute Cluster
Edition release, and interpret this as doom for Itanium, should remember
that Microsoft first supported Itanium on Windows Server and SQL Server,
and that didn't doom 64-bit extensions to x86, for which there was still
not an offical 64-bit Windows (XP, much less Server) or SQL Server
release, last I heard.
- Next message: John Smith: "HP offerings - but not for VMS"
- Previous message: david20_at_alpha1.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- In reply to: Warren Spencer: "Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Next in thread: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Reply: M. Ranjit Mathews: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Reply: Dean Woodward: "Re: Microsoft to skip Itanium with supercomputing Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading