Re: What can I do about "Asynchronous Device Attention" errors on network cards ?

From: Andrew (freestyle_london_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 11/27/04


Date: 27 Nov 2004 08:39:36 -0800

Thanks for all the replies so far,

I agree that there is a little debate over AUTO-SENSING... But as I
said I'm assured if you ring HP they will advise to have AUTO at both
the switch and the server !

Yet if you speak to any network engineer, he will say always avoid
this.

But my real question is for all you PRO's who manage a system on a day
to day basis.

Do you recieve these errors ? Being a Microsoft man, of course our
server don't bother to report anything. But it seems VMS complain...
sorry informs you even if the wind changes direction..

Which is all right and all, but at least microsoft give you an error
code which you can search on to figure out what to do. VMS simply says
"ERRROR, WARNING" and its up to judgement to figure it out

However I do like VMS so don't think I playing the MS card.. sheesh

Beach Runner <bob@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<CZrpd.34672$Oc.7007@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>...
> Andrew wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We are recieving several messages a day about recoverable errors.
> >
> > "Asynchronous Device Attention" EWA0
> >
> > We are using Gigabit network cards with failover enabled connected to
> > a cisco 6500 switch.
> >
> > Both the server and switch are set to AUTO... I'm told that this is
> > HP's recomendation. On this point if anyone has any other ideas please
> > let me know.
>
> Some controllers don't do well with auto negotiate. You'll see the
> symptoms at the data level. Do an analy/system sho lan/count and you'll
> see things like alignment errors. Better to hard code 100/full or the
> like on BOTH the controller and Cisco switch.
>
> Since network managers EVER admit to having problems, get a CISCO
> show tech will show a lot of information (NONE OF IT SECURE) but it
> will show the speed and duplex for each and every port.
>
> Absolutely make sure you are up to date on LAN ECOs, especially for
> newer (like DE600) controllers.
>
> Beach Runner
>
>
>
> >
> > So do I need to worry about these messages... Do other people who are
> > VMS admins here recieve similar messages ?



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Antwort: Re: Xen 3.0.3 and VLAN
    ... auto eth0.94 ... iface eth0.94 inet static ... netmask 255.255.255.0 ... If your data center is using a Cisco network (and chances are, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Networking - multiple nics not setting up
    ... There seems to be some sort of auto ... want the eth3:avah interface or the 169.x.x.x network. ... iface eth0 inet static ... UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Networking - multiple nics not setting up
    ... There seems to be some sort of auto ... want the eth3:avah interface or the 169.x.x.x network. ... iface eth0 inet static ... UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: $SETUAI() Query/Problem
    ... And network traffic coming from a PC needs to be identified by? ... > of password sniffing is unlikely. ... Some risk of password sniffing? ... Having hundreds of VMS systems might ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: $SETUAI() Query/Problem
    ... > $SETUAI transfers the entire UAF record to disk, ... VMS Breakin Evasion ... Well, the box would have to be physically connected into our network, ... > AST capabilities) did not exist when Authorize was written. ...
    (comp.os.vms)