Re: Intrusion attempts
From: Syltrem (syltremzulu_at_videotron.ca)
Date: 02/04/05
- Next message: Beach Runner: "Re: Vendor support for RMS (Attunity)"
- Previous message: Charles Newman: "Re: JF says ISPs should charge Microsoft users more"
- In reply to: Peter Weaver: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Next in thread: Ken Fairfield: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Reply: Ken Fairfield: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Reply: Larry Kilgallen: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:47:23 -0500
"Peter Weaver" <WeaverConsultingServices@sympatico.ca> a écrit dans le
message de news:36htg0F52uqiaU1@individual.net...
> so ANA/AUD/EV=LOGFAIL is what you need rather than /EV=BREAKIN.
>
> On the system I just tried (VAX/VMS 7.1) LGI_BRK_LIM is 5, so my 6th try
> showed up in the audit record as a breakin attempt with both the
> username and password showing. I do not have Auditing turned on for
> local login failures, but if I did the 1st to 5th attempts should have
> shown up with no password.
>
Yes Peter, that should have been /EVENT=LOGFAIL, not BREAKIN
But I still don't see the attempted username until I reach breaking limit.
My problem is that I have users who are preventing people in the whole shop
to log in, by locking up the IP port (source) from where all users of
handheld devices are logging in.
I thought that if I had the username information they are using, maybe (just
maybe) I would have an idea if they do that by mistake or by intent.
Right now I unlock (delete/intrusion) the port at interval. I don't like
that but I can't have everyone in there locked up when they change shifts
and try to log in.
-- Syltrem OpenVMS 7.3-1 + Oracle 8.1.7.4 http://pages.infinit.net/syltrem (OpenVMS related web site, en français) ---zulu is not in my email address--- > -- > Peter Weaver > Weaver Consulting Services Inc. > Canadian VAR for CHARON-VAX > www.weaverconsulting.ca > >
- Next message: Beach Runner: "Re: Vendor support for RMS (Attunity)"
- Previous message: Charles Newman: "Re: JF says ISPs should charge Microsoft users more"
- In reply to: Peter Weaver: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Next in thread: Ken Fairfield: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Reply: Ken Fairfield: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Reply: Larry Kilgallen: "Re: Intrusion attempts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]