Re: What is the Difference between Shadow and Mirrored disk?

norm.raphael_at_metso.com
Date: 03/03/05 

Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:38:07 -0500

helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply)
wrote on 03/02/2005 05:09:10 PM:

> In article <38lkqfF5os0vvU1@individual.net>, Roy Omond
> <Roy.Omond@BlueBubble.UK.Com> writes:
>
> > Sorry to harp on about this, but since it's coming from an HP address,
> > I'd just like to add the comment that using a *local* quorum disk as
> > suggested is not only unnecessary, but actually *increases* the
> > probability of losing the cluster.
> >
> > Node A (1 vote) + local quorum disk (1 vote)
> > Node B (1 vote)
> >
> > Node B goes down ...
> >
> > Now you have introduced an unnecessary probability of the cluster
> > being lost, equal to the probability of the quorum disk "disappearing".
>
> In the situation above, if the quorum disk disappears, then there are
> still 2 out of 3 votes there, so the cluster will survive. The reason
> this is pointless, though, is since if node A goes down, so does the
> disk, so the above is equivalent to giving node A two votes and node B 1
> vote.
>
> With a two-node cluster without a "proper" quorum disk (which is really
> a three-node cluster with the disk taking the place of the third node),
> there is NO WAY to have a real cluster, whether or not a "local quorum
> disk" is used and however the votes are distributed. Either you have a
> 50-50 situation: cluster freezes if either node goes down, or you have a
> master-slave situation, where one node must ALWAYS be up for the cluster
> to be up and it doesn't matter what the other one does.
>

> I really fail to see why people these days even bother with less than
> optimal solutions. Just get a cheap VAX and use it as a quorum node;
> problem solved.
>

..but no VAX can be in a supported cluster with an Itanium!

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Creating a wide area VMS Cluster
    ... > My goal is to provide a disaster tolerant cluster for both OS and data. ... disrupting the balance of the effect of votes between sites A and B. ... You have the option of a single shadowed system disk between the ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Creating a wide area VMS Cluster
    ... My goal is to provide a disaster tolerant cluster for both OS and data. ... At site B I have more hosts and data. ... I could give one host at each site one vote, yielding 3 expected votes, ... I'm thinking that each site will have a copy of the system disk. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Creating a wide area VMS Cluster
    ... > My goal is to provide a disaster tolerant cluster for both OS and data. ... > I could give one host at each site one vote, yielding 3 expected votes, ... > I'm thinking that each site will have a copy of the system disk. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: What is the Difference between Shadow and Mirrored disk?
    ... >>probability of losing the cluster. ... >>Node B (1 vote) ... > disk, so the above is equivalent to giving node A two votes and node B 1 ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • SUMMARY: changed WWID on cluster member boot disk
    ... disk and quorum disk of a single-member cluster, ... I could no longer boot from the cluster disks, ... the pre-cluster stand-alone system disk; ... the root1_domain on LUN containing the member boot disk was found ...
    (Tru64-UNIX-Managers)