Re: new Itanium after Tukwila: Poulson
prep_at_prep.synonet.com
Date: 03/06/05
- Next message: Charlie Hammond: "Re: PCSI product install failure - DDIS-E-TNF, invalid element syntax"
- Previous message: Alan Greig: "Re: New OpenVMS-Integrity Video"
- In reply to: Bill Todd: "Re: new Itanium after Tukwila: Poulson"
- Next in thread: Rob Young: "Re: new Itanium after Tukwila: Poulson"
- Reply: Rob Young: "Re: new Itanium after Tukwila: Poulson"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 23:39:38 +0800
Bill Todd <billtodd@metrocast.net> writes:
> prep@prep.synonet.com wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> BTW, 90 and 65nM are the `new' sizes, don't expect to see 45nM till
>> around 2010.
>
> I think that Intel is already sampling 65 nm. product for introduction
> about a year from now; IBM and AMD reportedly aren't far behind. My
> impression is that at least Intel and IBM have already got 45
> nm. devices running in the lab: do you have a solid basis for not
> expecting 45 nm. product before 2010?
No one has production capable steppers as yet, plus the small detail
of leakage and working high K gates.
Intel has a second problem in that IBM holds lots of the key patents.
--
Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd.,
+61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda.
West Australia 6076
comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot
Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.
EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.
- Next message: Charlie Hammond: "Re: PCSI product install failure - DDIS-E-TNF, invalid element syntax"
- Previous message: Alan Greig: "Re: New OpenVMS-Integrity Video"
- In reply to: Bill Todd: "Re: new Itanium after Tukwila: Poulson"
- Next in thread: Rob Young: "Re: new Itanium after Tukwila: Poulson"
- Reply: Rob Young: "Re: new Itanium after Tukwila: Poulson"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|