Re: HP hostility to alpha holding back itanium?
From: Bob Kaplow (kaplow_r_at_encompasserve.org.TRABoD)
Date: 05/05/05
- Next message: AEF: "Re: how, exactly, is SYS$NODE defined?"
- Previous message: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: More VAX help needed"
- In reply to: Roger Ivie: "Re: HP hostility to alpha holding back itanium?"
- Next in thread: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER: "Re: HP hostility to alpha holding back itanium?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 5 May 2005 11:51:20 -0500
In article <slrnd7ivfe.4tp.rivie@Stench.no.domain>, Roger Ivie <rivie@ridgenet.net> writes:
> On 2005-05-04, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> wrote:
>> Sorry. The original 8086 was nothing more than a fancy toy controller,
>> 16 bit CPU with 8 bit bus,
>
> The original 8086 had a 16-bit bus. It was the cut down 8088 that had
> the 8-bit bus.
>
>> And not long after the
>> 8086 came the vax with full 32 bit addressing
When was the 8086 first released? I don't recall seeing 8086 based stuff on
the market until AFTER the VAX and VMS.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org
You [should] not examine legislation in the light of the
benefits it will convey if properly administered, but in the
light of the wrongs it would do and the harm it would cause if
improperly administered -- Lyndon Johnson, former President of
the U.S.
- Next message: AEF: "Re: how, exactly, is SYS$NODE defined?"
- Previous message: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: More VAX help needed"
- In reply to: Roger Ivie: "Re: HP hostility to alpha holding back itanium?"
- Next in thread: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER: "Re: HP hostility to alpha holding back itanium?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
