Re: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?
From: AEF (spamsink2001_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/30/05
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Previous message: Hoff Hoffman: "Re: Jump to console ?"
- In reply to: bob_at_instantwhip.com: "Re: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Next in thread: bob_at_instantwhip.com: "Re: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Sep 2005 16:36:25 -0700
bob@instantwhip.com wrote:
> "Although it would be nice, Itanium does not need to be the leader in
> latest speeds-n-feeds in order to be successful. It just needs to be
> competitive."
>
> this is sun logic ... can't compete on the technical
> merits so we will just throw together an 80,000 cpu
> box with a million megs of cache and make our
> machine competitive ... that is how you help IT
> progress to new levels ... that is the x86 bandid
> theory ... only, eventually, you run out of bandaids!
Well, x86 has been "running on bandaids" for years. So I would think
that -- based on this reasoning -- this bodes very well indeed for
Itanium, since Itanium has just pulled out of the starting gate.
- Next message: JF Mezei: "Re: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Previous message: Hoff Hoffman: "Re: Jump to console ?"
- In reply to: bob_at_instantwhip.com: "Re: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Next in thread: bob_at_instantwhip.com: "Re: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|