RE: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?
From: Larry Kilgallen (Kilgallen_at_SpamCop.net)
Date: 09/30/05
- Next message: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: Vamp Hacked!"
- Previous message: Christoph Gartmann: "Drawlib not loaded"
- In reply to: Main, Kerry: "RE: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Sep 2005 07:54:50 -0500
In article <FD827B33AB0D9C4E92EACEEFEE2BA2FB70BFB2@tayexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net>, "Main, Kerry" <Kerry.Main@hp.com> writes:
> Thx for all the history, but I was specifically referring to JF's
> assertion that Intel and HP had decided to relegate Itanium to the
> supercomputer or in your case "high end".
>
> If any business system from 2-128cpu's is what JF and you refer to high
> end or supercomputers, then so be it. You are correct that that is what
> Intel and HP have decided to "limit" IA64 to.
Another viewpoint is that the term "high end" refers to any system not
running Microsoft Windows.
- Next message: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: Vamp Hacked!"
- Previous message: Christoph Gartmann: "Drawlib not loaded"
- In reply to: Main, Kerry: "RE: Why did VMS users go along with the itanium farce?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
