Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI
From: syslost (wm.reynolds_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/07/05
- Next message: Steven M. Schweda: "Re: Samba 2.2-8 build 20050817 ported to Itanium OpenVMS 8.2-1"
- Previous message: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Multiple X servers?"
- In reply to: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Next in thread: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Reply: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Reply: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 7 Oct 2005 07:06:36 -0700
> That said, how do you feel about "unsupported" tricks? It's possible
> (recommendable is another question) to mirror within an array (HSx pair)
> and control that from the host, though the methods of communicating with
> the controller pair are unsupported anymore, though they still work to a
> fair degree.
If this means putting both members of the shadow set on the same set of
controllers, no. We need the applications to keep running even if we
lose both of the controllers serviceing one of the members of the
shadow set.
- Next message: Steven M. Schweda: "Re: Samba 2.2-8 build 20050817 ported to Itanium OpenVMS 8.2-1"
- Previous message: david20_at_alpha2.mdx.ac.uk: "Re: Multiple X servers?"
- In reply to: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Next in thread: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Reply: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Reply: David J Dachtera: "Re: How long for a shadow copy over CI"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|